Articles[]
Please categorize the articles you have created. Leaving pages with no categories is frowned upon. ☢ Energy X ☣ 13:54, June 12, 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, im not the best at formatting, tagging, or anything. Took me four whole hours to get that bloody non-canon bar at the top of each page. I'll try my best to tag everything that is untagged YukiHakimoto (talk) 13:57, June 12, 2018 (UTC)
Response to hunting rifle note on my talk page[]
Thanks for your note. Response on my talk page. User_talk:Knife_Maker Mak (talk) 22:41, June 14, 2018 (UTC)
Spelling and capitalisation[]
Great work on those FBG articles! I like that you actually add content to the pages, which is a lot more work than just spamming pages onto Nukapedia (which would not be as good).
I noticed that you're making a few common mistakes and I hoped I could help you improve:
- Nukapedia always uses American English spelling (unlike Wikipedia, where they use either as long as it's consistent within the page) (although those rules obviously don't apply to the forum and talk pages). This means that you should write "power armor" instead of "power armour".
- Nukapedia uses its own capitalisation rules that usually deviate from the in-game capitalisation. In short, the only things that are capitalised are proper names, so it would be "a super mutant" rather than "a Super Mutant". For the long version of the rules (which I'd recommend reading), check the guidelines.
Anyway, you're doing great work, so keep it up!
- FDekker talk 07:42, June 13, 2018 (UTC)
Re: Honest Hard Bug[]
I unverified your bug since you were the editor who added such bug and wiki policy states that "Editors should not apply the verified tag to bugs they have added themselves.". You as an editor added that bug and you as an editor should not verify it. Jgrsoto (talk) 16:36, August 2, 2018 (UTC)
- I am aware of this rule. However, I was verifying it on behalf of someone else who doesn't have an account. So thus, my edit should have counted as someone else. As the someone else cant not make the edit without my account. Do you understand now? YukiHakimoto (talk) 16:39, August 2, 2018 (UTC)
- Independently of your intentions you are still acting as the same editor. Jgrsoto (talk) 16:51, August 2, 2018 (UTC)
- So even though the bug is verified, and the person who can verify it doesn't have an account (nor intents to get one, if I might add). The bug will remain unverified because of overly lawful rules? Perfect, that's perfect. YukiHakimoto (talk) 16:58, August 2, 2018 (UTC)
- Independently of your intentions you are still acting as the same editor. Jgrsoto (talk) 16:51, August 2, 2018 (UTC)
(←) I get the point you're making Yuki and we do know you more than most editors, so I'd be comfortable with saying you speak the truth. The problem is if we allow one person to say "I know someone who saw this" after they added a bug, we would have to accept it from everyone, user and anon alike. If it is common enough an occurrence, ask Rebel or bleep if they can verify it quickly. Sakaratte - Talk to the catmin 16:59, August 2, 2018 (UTC)