Forum:Vote: Reference policy addendum 1.3

	This forum page has been archived. Please do not make any further edits unless they are for maintenance purposes.

The vote below determines support for an addendum proposal discussed here. Gaining approval, the following will be reflected in the reference guideline policy. Thank you for your time in voting on the following. -kdarrow ^{take her for a spin!} 10:35, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Addendum

Vote

Poll finished on 10:33 am March 17, 2022 (UTC). A consensus must be reached by voting before any action is taken. You can vote by placing one of the following lines in the appropriate section: Use # {{yes}} ~~~~ if you support the proposal. Use # {{no}} ~~~~ if you are against the proposal. Use # {{neutral}} ~~~~ if you wish to abstain. Please do not edit other user's votes.

Yes

1. This is kind of a no-brainer for me! -Eckserah ^{Head Dataminer} 10:40, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
2. Yeah that makes sense.-Rubbinmahbelly ^{Have a great day} 10:56, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
3. The Appalachian 10:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
4. This is an absolute no brainer, especially if we want to preserve as much as we can! Dracotherium (talk)
5. –Findabair^{The benefit of the doubt is often doubtful.} 19:34, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
6. Yeah, i have to agree with this, its better in every single aspect in keeping history The Mug Monarch Today at 20:52
   20:52, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
7. LovinglyGaslight (talk) 04:34, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
8. -kdarrow ^{take her for a spin!} 08:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
9. - Makes perfecto sense to me. bow burger box 11:18, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
10. I agree Hellotalos (talk) 01:58, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

No

Neutral

Result

Vote passes and will be implemented in the reference guideline policy. -kdarrow ^{take her for a spin!} 01:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)