Talk: BDJP007301

This user is in school. 

This user may be away or inactive for varying periods of time, especially if they have exams.
Although they may occasionally be able to do some editing, talk page messages might not receive a timely response.

Snapshot bug fixes sections

Hello,

I'm Aaron, I've been doing the work on the bug fix sections these past handful of months. I've seen you working on the fixes lately, and I like it, it's good to know it's getting done. I only haven't been keeping up because my little netbook died and I am between machines right now.

I generally try to do a good job and make sure the bugfixes go to the snapshot page that represents actually where the bug was fixed, rather than where the tracker says it was fixed -- and I noticed you doing that as well. I know the tracker software doesn't let the mods mark them fixed in the right version oftentimes, and frankly it would be a huge job for them in addition to what they already have to do, so I don't blame them.

So I just wanted to let you know, I was not able to test the bugs in 14w30a, 30b, 30c or 31a, I just put them there with the intention of sorting them out later. Feel free to tackle that if you are so inclined. If not, I'll get to it, but in either case thanks.

Any questions, lemme know.

– Sealbudsman (Aaron) (talk) – 19:59, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Removal of {{Fixes}}

May I ask why you removed {{Fixes}} from 14w32d? The main point of the template removes the problem of several mistakes that are commonly made, (forgetting to update number, forgetting to sort by number), and it automatically makes the better version of the tracker link. It is also not at all complicated to use. --KnightMiner ^(t|c) 02:29, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

IK about that. The reason why I removed it was because it was basically too confusing for me. You see, I'm basically just not used to sudden change. --BDJP007301 ^(t|c) 04:31, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

The main reason I was switching it over was because it would likely be used on all version pages at a later time, and it was easier to only need one system between 1.8 and it's snapshots. Also, I figured if I added it to the latest snapshot, it would get used when the next one got made. --KnightMiner ^(t|c) 21:54, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Issues for 1.4

Hi there, if you have time or are interested, would you be able to link up the bugs from 1.4 (versions + snapshots) to the bug tracker, and sort them? At the moment most of those pages don't have links to the bug tracker, and seem fairly incomplete. Thanks –Goandgoo ᐸ Talk
Contribs
Edits 12:52, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Will do. --BDJP007301 ^(t|c) 13:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you put the bugs on the 1.4.3-pre and 1.4.2-pre pages, and I was wondering how you knew that those bugs were fixed in those versions. – Sealbudsman (Aaron) (t|c) – 15:05, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

I ordered the bugs by how they were created and sorted them from the beginning to end. Afterward, I clicked on the fix version (in this case, 1.4.2 / 1.4.3), and found yet even more bugs that were fixed in those versions. I was able to sort them out by affected versions, creation, etc on the pages. --BDJP007301 ^(t|c) BDJP007301 16:21, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Once you have finished linking to the bug tracker, 1.5 also needs to be sorted. –Goandgoo ᐸ Talk
Contribs
Edits 21:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Just started working on it tonight, and I'll continue tomorrow! :) --BDJP007301 ^(t|c) BDJP007301 01:52, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi again, here is a list of all the versions without a sorted fixes section/possibly incomplete: 1.7.1-pre, 13w11a, 13w12~, 1.5.1-pre, 1.6-pre, 1.6.3-pre, 1.6.2-pre, 1.4.4-pre, 1.4.5-pre, 13w25c, 1.6.1-pre. Thanks for your help in fixing up these sections :) –Goandgoo ᐸ Talk
Contribs
Edits 13:31, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Will do. Always a pleasure to help. --BDJP007301 ^(t|c) BDJP007301 13:42, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Bugs reopened in the bug tracker

Good morning, a few things:

Tip; when you remove bugs because they are 'reopened', be sure to also search the wiki for all instances of the bug (usually searching by the bug id number is enough), because it could be listed in several places; like the bug you just removed from 1.7.10 was also listed on the snapshot page. I've been doing that so far for your reopens, so no worries to this point.

Also when you put things on (for instance) 1.8 snapshots, and they are listed as affecting 1.7.x or lower, you can also go ahead and list them on the 1.8 page as well, cause basically for a player that's not playing the snapshots, they are bugs that a player would see fixed when he jumps from 1.7.10 to 1.8. I've been doing that so far for bugs you put on snapshot pages, so again, no worries so far, but I thought I would mention it, it's a simple thing I think.

Also I noticed you were keeping track of bugs 'reopened' and I thought to myself, is BDJP doing it in a more efficient way than I am? Because my way of keeping track of reopened bugs is actually kind of hectic and time-consuming in my opinion, as opposed to my way of keeping track of newly-closed bugs, and I would love to know if you have a better way.

Cheers,

– Sealbudsman (Aaron) (t|c) – 14:47, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

1.8-pre

Atomoclk00 here, the changes to Realms on the 1.8-pre-release page were added back in 1.7.10, I am not vandalising I'm getting rid of false information. -Atomoclk00 (talk) 11:41, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Broken MCF and Tumblr links

Hi,

The links for your MC Forums account and Tumblr contain "http://" twice, redirecting anyone that clicks on it to http.com. :) -Sonicwave (talk) 04:33, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Fixed! Thanks for the heads up! BDJP007301 04:49, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

By the way, you could use {{-}} to removed the need for all those line breaks after your userboxes. –KnightMiner ^(t|c) 05:07, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

I don't know what happened

I messed up confusing ladders by stairs and I'm sorry, in my language they are referred by the same word. Kkkllleee (talk)kkkllleee

Its okay. BDJP007301 04:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

On another subject: What are you talking about, community names are relevant, people reading the page would be less confused, that's why we have eye of ender/ender eye, mushrom stew/mushroom soup, crafting table/workbench, it's not new to have alternative names make it into the wiki, so my question is: what is your standard?

Kkkllleee (talk)kkkllleee

My standard is that we should go by what Mojang says the name of the block / item it is. BDJP007301 05:45, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Then how do you explain the names I just said? Every time I do something I do something wrong. Kkkllleee (talk) 05:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)kkkllleee

Its mainly based on three factors: in game name: past and present, names used by mojang, or internal name (name in the code).

• Ender Eye is the name in the code for Eye of Ender
• Mushroom Stew is sometimes called soup by Notch and in the code
• Workbench is the internal name of the crafting table, as well as the old name

And don't be too worried about messing up at first, most of us here messed up at first too.

–KnightMiner ^(t·c) 16:35, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Can you help me adding the marker tag addition to the armor stand? Kkkllleee (talk) 20:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)kkkllleee

Punctuation in quotations

Concerning your undo here -- it's the convention in American English that punctuation that follows quoted text is moved inside the quotation (for example, Rule 3a). As a programmer I think it's a terrible convention (and thus I don't feel strongly motivated to undo your undo), but it is the convention and no explanation/edit summary should be needed for such a "simple" punctuation correction (though the third paragraph of changes was more questionable). Not asking for anything, just expressing an opinion. :) —munin · · 18:17, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Planned versions

You have been saying that "items that existed before" doesn't make sense. What I mean is items that already existed in survival mode, but now appear in creative mode. Hopefully this gives you a clarification.
~From Contrapple 02:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

That's now how the creative inventory additions part works. Its meant to talk about additions to the creative inventory, not items that existed before. There was no consensus to add that part in, so that's why I removed it. BDJP ^(t|c) 10:01, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Reverting replies to old comments

Since the addition of the MCW:Talk page guidelines, it is no longer disallowed to reply to old comments (advised against, but not disallowed). While I doubt most users will restore the comments, adding the comments is not against the rules anymore. –KnightMiner ^t/_c 15:07, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Looks like I'm suffering from a bit of jetlag then. BDJP ^(t|c) 15:15, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

So.

Your condition is not a reason to revert the text to a worse condition and insist on it. Generally, content may cause protest, and that protest may not be a cause for fixing/removing content – who knows, maybe it is needed how it was. In case of you, that rule should also apply to bug descriptions, and also deleting this message. — NickTheRed37 ^t/_c (f.k.a. Naista2002) 18:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)