| ||||||
I'm not going to bother making the edit myself since I'm unfamiliar with how the wiki works anymore, but this is not T-45D armor, it's a new type of power armor called "T-60B", which appears to be an improved T45D
T45D and T51B are also confirmed components. As well as some other versions like the X-01 MKII which is the name for the Fallout 2 / New Vegas style Enclave power armor
--142.134.38.45 05:00, June 15, 2015 (UTC)
It should be named T-60b. --AleximMose (talk) 03:53, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
In response to what AleximMose said, both T-60 and T-60b were shown at the E3 showcase, along with a sub menu to pick models a-f. I suggest the page be left with the name it has until it can be verified as to whether or not they are simply variations of the same model or complete improvements. RadiationKing13 (talk) 18:18, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
The power armor shown on a power armor rack on this page has had third party texture changes done to it, IE it's from a modded game, shouldn't be used on a wiki page 00:28, November 25, 2015 (UTC)
Kinetic Dynamo description correct?[]
The kinetic dynamo mod says it refreshes actions points from "taking damage." I may be mistaken, but I thought the game description says you refresh AP faster from taking melee damage. Even if the game does say this, is it true that kinetic dynamo turns all damage into AP refresh? PandaBot3000 (talk) 02:00, January 1, 2016 (UTC)
Army emblem[]
Has anyone noticed the small emblem on the torso of the T-60 in military paint job? it looks like an emblem for a army division as it is something in a shield, similar to the 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment's emblem. Nick3258 (talk) 14:37, February 6, 2016 (UTC)
Unsourced Statements[]
"T-60 was rapidly deployed and extensively used by the U.S. Army in all theaters to supplement the more difficult to produce T-51 power armor."
"Compared to the T-45, the T-60 is much more heavily armored, although it lacks the sophisticated armor pattern of the T-51. The end result is an extremely protective armor system, though protection comes at the expense of agility and a reduction in battlefield awareness"
Are there sources for any of these bolded statements? Darthfish (talk) 23:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- No, it was speculation and I removed it. -kdarrow
take her for a spin! 19:20, 8 March 2022 (UTC)