| ||||||
nevermind , wrong house
Sunny Smiles Sleeping in a Caravan Trailer[]
I know that Sunny Smiles sleeps and lives in Trudy's house... But I swear, one time I found her sleeping in one of the caravan trailers around Goodsprings. Can anyone verify this? --Cyberweasel89 (talk) 03:43, December 9, 2013 (UTC)
- It's a common occurrence for NPC's to sleep in abnormal locations, so I'd say you're probably right. Not really notable in specific circumstances though.
morituri te salutamus 04:11, December 9, 2013 (UTC)
In regards to Easy Pete using his house[]
I understand why Easy Pete not frequently using his own home is too subjective of a detail to be considered a negative aspect of his home as a potential Player Housing. But shouldn't it also be too subjective to be considered a positive aspect as well? Listing him infrequently using his own home as one of the reason's Easy Pete's Home is good Player Housing is not something everyone who uses his home as Player Housing might agree with, in fact it may throw off potential Couriers looking for housing who may of been interested in having Easy Pete as their roommate due to his rather easy going, laid back demeanor. Also its just backhandedly rude to say that him not being around is a good thing. (Concerned Anon) 21:32, July 28th, 2017 (UTC)
Well thank you for bringing this to the talkpage. I reverted the edit because of the "Unfortunately, Easy Pete will rarely use the house. " part. We don't really use words like "unfortunately" in this situation as it could be seen as an opinion. Thank you.123123abcabc (talk) 21:43, July 28, 2017 (UTC)
That is fair. Perhaps a middle ground would be ideal, where Easy Pete not frequenting his home is simply stated in a sentence after describing the positive reasons to use his home as Player Housing. The statement that he lives near the fast travel point could be moved as part of the sentence listing the positive aspects of his housing. (Somewhat Tentative But Overall Less Concerned Anon) 21:55 July 28th, 2017 (UTC)
Good idea. But I don't think we should include the positive reasons to use his home as Player Housing as that could be seen as strategy which is not allowed here. Thanks. 123123abcabc (talk) 22:03, July 28, 2017 (UTC)
In that case, how does this sound: "Easy Pete's house can potentially serve as player housing. All the storage within is safe, none of the items or beds are owned, and it is also fairly close to the fast travel point for Goodspring's." These are reasons as to why it can be player housing, as opposed to reasons why its particularly good or not like how often Easy Pete frequents his home could subjectively seem ether or say the property value of homes in Goodsprings over all vs one of the homes within Primm after finishing the My Kind of Town quest. (Less Concerned Anon) 22:10 July 28th 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, but I think that conflicts with this.
123123abcabc (talk) 22:16, July 28, 2017 (UTC)
Shouldn't the mention of Easy Pete's House as possible player housing, let alone as "good player housing" as described on the live article, be removed then? The bullet point as of the live article seems to fit that description of what that rule prevents. My suggested edit in quotations was to make it less opinionated/more objective then what is currently on the page. Also because Easy Pete not being around often, as a positive quality, is an objective opinion. (Confounded and Concerned Anon) 22:26 July 28th 2017 (UTC)
Anything that conflicts with the policies should be changed. You can correct the article if you wish. (also please sign your edits with 4 tildes) 123123abcabc (talk) 22:34, July 28, 2017 (UTC)
Gotcha 74.88.72.232 22:37, July 28, 2017 (UTC)