Extended Data Fig. 7: Comparison of the CO2 effect size (%) and the associated confidence intervals for major (a) plant (b) soil, and (c) operationally-defined soil phosphorus (P) pool variables, calculated by the original approach as reported in the main text (Original) and a bootstrapping method (Bootstrap, Supplementary Information 2.2). | Nature

Extended Data Fig. 7: Comparison of the CO2 effect size (%) and the associated confidence intervals for major (a) plant (b) soil, and (c) operationally-defined soil phosphorus (P) pool variables, calculated by the original approach as reported in the main text (Original) and a bootstrapping method (Bootstrap, Supplementary Information 2.2).

From: Microbial competition for phosphorus limits the CO2 response of a mature forest

Extended Data Fig. 7

(a) The CO2 effects on plant P pools, including canopy, sapwood, heartwood, total wood, fine root, coarse root, forest floor leaf litter, understorey and, understorey litter; (b) the CO2 effects on soil P pools, including microbes, labile soil P and total soil P pools in the 0���10 cm, 10–30 cm, and 30–60 cm depths, respectively; (c) the CO2 effect on soil P pools in the top 10 cm of the soil, classified based on the Hedley fractionation method, including exchangeable inorganic P (Pi), exchangeable organic P (Po), moderately labile Po, and occluded P, which is the remaining P that we consider to be relatively unavailable to plants. Values indicate the mean absolute CO2 effect, calculated by using elevated minus ambient CO2 treatment (n = 3), with the coloured bars indicating confidence intervals at 95%, 85% and 75% (two-tailed t-test, with lighter colours indicating higher confidence levels).

Back to article page