Maybe it's obvious, but I'm asking this question in the context of the potential SCOTUS review of the Colorado Supreme Court ("CSC") ruling which upheld the Denver District Court's ("DDC") ruling that Trump "engaged in insurrection" (page 95).
IF SCOTUS does issue some other ruling that goes against CSC's ruling on the insurrection issue, what happens exactly? Does it also invalidate the DDC Ruling? My guess is that it depends on exactly what the SCOTUS ruling is. That is, I think they could "vacate" which if I understand that term correctly, would leave the DDC's ruling in place as if CSC had not ruled on it at all. Or they could "reverse" it would I think would then also reverse the DDC's ruling. I'm sure there might be other options too??
Apologies if this is a really basic law question, but I was unable to find any clear answers on Google. Also - yes, I'm aware that the DDC also ruled that Amendment 14 Section 3 doesn't apply to the President. I want to make very clear that my question is not political and I'm not looking for answers on the merits of whether he did or didn't commit insurrection or whether Section 3 applies to the President - I'm ONLY trying to understand the legal procedural consequences, and just happen using this specific case as an example.