Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 November 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 6

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 00:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated and incomplete. Club plays in Serie D and has currently only five notable players, see F.C. Grosseto S.S.D.#Current squad Kq-hit (talk) 22:17, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 00:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and outdated. Club plays in Serie D and has only three notable players, see San Marino Calcio#Current squad Kq-hit (talk) 22:09, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 00:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template unused and outdated. Club plays in Serie D and has very few notable players. The main article Sorrento Calcio does not include a current squad. Kq-hit (talk) 21:52, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 00:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No current squad. "The club was excluded altogether from the Italian football league pyramid, and is currently only active as a youth sector." (Source: S.S. Virtus Lanciano 1924) Kq-hit (talk) 21:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:09, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Topic (Africa), Template:Topic (Asia), Template:Topic (Europe), Template:Topic (Oceania), Template:Topic (North America), Template:Topic (South America) and Template:Topic (Americas).
Very poorly used and can be replaced by {{Africa topic}} series with proper parameters. 2001:DA8:201:3512:618D:98CB:D5D6:2906 (talk) 17:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2001:DA8:201:3512:618D:98CB:D5D6:2906 (talk) 17:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus to merge, however feel free to explore rewriting the Hindu template infobxo as a wrapper as suggested. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:13, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox Hindu temple with Template:Infobox religious building.
I have raised it earlier, raising it again. The template is a mere copy of the resulting template. There are very little or no new parameters. Why keep a separate template? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 15:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:14, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template which may not accurately represent Wikipedia copyright policy. It has been altered by an IP-hopping individual with a problematic editing history. Edgeweyes (talk) 14:20, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It gives useful information about sound recordings and copyright law. 108.71.123.212 (talk) 12:47, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 14 ~ Rob13Talk 00:45, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

mostly redirects and duplicates navigation found in Template:Monk (TV series), and in the infobox succession links, and in the main season articles Frietjes (talk) 13:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

not used in any articles and mostly redirects Frietjes (talk) 13:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

we really dont need an infobox for a film series of 2. the book is a redirect. we really dont need this even if and when a third is produced, as the links to the other 2 will be all over each article. this is best for larger franchises and notable ancillary articles, like "Ouija toys" (can you imagine, making a TOY for KIDS out of a horror franchise? Yuck) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:40, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).