Wikipedia:Peer review/Undertale/archive1
Undertale[edit]
| Toolbox |
|---|
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to bring it to FA status. Expecting a TFA on the game's tenth anniversary.
Thanks, lunaeclipse (talk) 12:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comments from Skyshifter
Welp, I literally had that same idea too! Here are some things that I'm pretty sure should be done before a FAC.
- Undertale has been studied in multiple scholarly sources. Adding them is necessary for a comprehensive article. It's possible that a "Themes" section can be created.
- The Reception section seems lacking, for a game that received so much attention — in fact, I originally planned to rewrite this section. More reviews and aspects of the game can be added here.
- "Impact and legacy" can likely be expanded to include Undertale's influence in other games. Some retrospective Undertale articles (i.e. "Undertale was released 5 years ago" etc.) could probably be added here. "Fandom" could likely be expanded too — in fact, I think an Undertale fandom article is feasible.
Skyshiftertalk 13:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comments from BP!
- Game Rant sources are low-quality sources that should be omitted.
- Italicize game and film titles in the citation titles per MOS:CONFORMTITLE (this was brought up at Wikipedia:Peer review/Ada Wong/archive1).
- Works/websites/magazines should be all linked at citations
- Italicize the works/websites/magazines since some of them aren't yet, like IGN.
- If some citations don't have an author, just simply remove the "staff" as an author since it's irrelevant.
- Several citations don't have authors. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 12:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC)