Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Council (comics)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:11, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Council (comics)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by User:Andrew Davidson with no meaningful rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). Considering the very sorry state of this article, there is really nothing else I can say here instead of shaking my head again at this WP:POINTless waste of time. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Completely unsourced plot summary, with a bit of WP:OR thrown in on top. Searching for any additional sources turns up almost nothing on any of the three versions mentioned here, and what very little there that exists is merely mentions in plot summaries. The title of the article is also way too generic to ever be useful as a search term for a Redirect anywhere. Rorshacma (talk) 16:14, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a very minor organization with no references and no notability. Rhino131 (talk) 17:31, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. William Harris (talk) 23:22, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.