Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of feature films based on cartoons
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 02:39, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of feature films based on cartoons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:INDISCRIMINATE seems to apply. It's a long list of films barely related to each other so doesn't seem useful Indagate (talk) 20:32, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Television, and Entertainment. Indagate (talk) 20:32, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete via WP:IINFO and User:TenPoundHammer/Wikipedia is not TV Tropes. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Indiscriminate collection of data that also inappropriately mixes comic strips, animated cartoons, and possibly webcomics. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:42, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Lists. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:43, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: Is this version of the article terrible, absolutely yes (but I think that about most list articles). Can anyone suggest a way to cut it down to a more discriminating shorter list? WP:PRESERVE. -- 109.78.199.198 (talk) 21:16, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- I'm no fan of list articles (especially poorly sourced indiscriminate ones) but I'm very disappointed that no one is even wiling to suggest any possible way to salvage this list article. It may be an ugly mess but good faith effort has gone into it. Is there really no way to cut this list down into a shorter more coherent page that might actually be useful? -- 109.79.175.77 (talk) 13:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Don't think there is anything salvageable, lot of references to IMDb so shouldn't be used, other information should be at the individual articles
- You can copy to draft or, if you create an account, copy to sandbox so can edit if deleted and try and salvage Indagate (talk) 14:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- If it is not salvageable, then making it a draft is a moot point. I will take this experience as a warning against editing list articles in future. -- 109.79.175.77 (talk) 22:47, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- I'm no fan of list articles (especially poorly sourced indiscriminate ones) but I'm very disappointed that no one is even wiling to suggest any possible way to salvage this list article. It may be an ugly mess but good faith effort has gone into it. Is there really no way to cut this list down into a shorter more coherent page that might actually be useful? -- 109.79.175.77 (talk) 13:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.