Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of EconTalk episodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 21:44, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of EconTalk episodes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Episode list for a podcast, all compiled from the primary source. Tagged as not meeting notability criteria for lists since 2013 and not fixed - claims of notability by inheritance only. I think this can safely be left to its own website. Guy (Help!) 09:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I listen to EconTalk regularly, and think it's a valuable resource. This list seems too much for an encyclopedia. I think the Econtalk wikipedia page needs much more attention to justify this list. One alternative that I'm ok with is to put a list of his more prominent guests each year right on the Econtalk wikipedia page.Sanpitch (talk) 23:53, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. If EconTalk itself is notable, then there shouldn't be a problem with the episode list. N I H I L I S T I C (talk) 19:12, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sanpitch:'s idea seems sensible, the notable information from the list can be transferred to the main article.Jonpatterns (talk) 09:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One thing has absolutely nothing to do with the other. --Calton | Talk 01:50, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability is never inherited. Exemplo347 (talk) 22:09, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unless there's some evidence that the individual episodes have some sort of notability -- as evidenced by reliable sources discussing them individually -- there's no point to such a list. WP is not a directory service. --Calton | Talk 01:50, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No indication that meets standalone list notability criteria. Neutrality^talk 02:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per user Sanpitch's view. The list is bit too encyclopedic and should stress the more prominent guests each year on this site. --Artene50 (talk) 21:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination--Kostas20142 (talk) 12:50, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.