Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junghwa (singer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. LFaraone 01:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Junghwa (singer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Singer that might fall under too soon See-Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solji Wgolf (talk) 17:11, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 19:02, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 19:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Junghwa is not independantly notable outside her group and most of the article was copied from EXID. Random86 (talk) 19:04, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually, if this was a , say Zac Brown Band member page, I would delete it, because not only is it big, but most people only really care about the singer. But with Girl Groups, especially small ones lke EXID, fans want to know everything about all the members, just look at the Girl's Generation page, every member has a good page, even kicked-out member Jessica. So I think we should keep the page and maybe change a few things about it. If we have to delete, Solji's and Hani's are the ones I would delete last, since they are both quite notable in South Korea. Arceus3333 (talk) 21:30, 14 May 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arceus3333 (talkcontribs)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:32, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, then definite merge! --Prosperosity (talk) 03:39, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.