Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internationale Musische Werkstatt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Internationale Musische Werkstatt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Overly detailed article about a non-notable workshop, basically serving as webhost for the organisation with zero independent information (Google did only find a few passing mentions, mostly from affiliated websites). I would usually just redirect the page to Verband Christlicher Pfadfinderinnen und Pfadfinder, but as it's a fully developed long article, a formal AfD is probably the better course of action. Note: I have already added a summary section in Verband Christlicher Pfadfinderinnen und Pfadfinder to prepare an eventual "Delete and redirect". GermanJoe (talk) 15:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: From my search, there is some minor media but nothing too substantive and nothing I could find in reputable secondary sources. It may benefit from a real thorough search for references if that hasn't been done. If there are such references, that would be meaningful and may change my delete vote. Orthodox2014 (talk) 16:05, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. sst 05:26, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. sst 05:26, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:GNG. Only gnews is the Wikipedia article. LibStar (talk) 08:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.