Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grace Monroe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 04:16, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grace_Monroe

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't have a reason to be an independent page. No notable real world coverage, and the page is basically retelling the story of Book 3. Myfriendshavelotsoffriends (talk) 03:44, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 March 12. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:09, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Fictional elements, and Television. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or restore redirect. Zero real-world notability, meaning that as per WP:NFICTION (which is an essay, but based on policy), "Articles on fiction elements are expected to cover more about "real-world" aspects of the element, such as its development and reception, than "in-universe" details." This clearly fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:52, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of stand-alone notability, 100% plot summary = WP:FANCRUFT. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.