Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gemworld

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Amethyst, Princess of Gemworld. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 11:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gemworld (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. The usual dePROD with no helpful rationale, so here we go. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:53, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:53, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:53, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:53, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with Amethyst, Princess of Gemworld. I don't see the need to separate the location from the character. Rhino131 (talk) 12:48, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Amethyst, Princess of Gemworld. The location basically exists as the location of Amethyst's stories, and pretty much all sources mentioning it are actually discussing her and her various comic series as the primary topic. There is currently no reliably sourced information to Merge, but redirecting it to the article on the main topic would make sense. Rorshacma (talk) 15:50, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as above per as a redirect alternative to deletion WP:ATD-R that provides the reader information they are seeking. -2pou (talk) 16:08, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or redirect. A decent target has been identified. Article otherwise does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of third party sources. Shooterwalker (talk) 04:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.