Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foundation for Enterprise Development
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Foundation for Enterprise Development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article seems to be mainly just a way to advertise a non-notable foundation. Also, the creator (User:Bizzwriter) has a COI given his profession, which can be seen at his LinkedIn account. Jrcla2 (talk) 19:18, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I am also nominating the following related pages because of advertising and COI:
- SPORTS for Exceptional Athletes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Jrcla2 (talk) 19:20, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Article fails to demonstrate notability through its references and text. Probably a nice group of people, but that is not the point here. The point here is that we need a well-above average impact on the world before it can show up in an encyclopedia. Student7 (talk) 00:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.
- Delete both. One is a foundation with a vague "broad charter to help develop successful enterprises"; the other an athletic association for disabled people. No indication that either entity has had significant impact on culture, technology, or history. Both read like PR puff pieces. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:21, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The essay that I think Smerdis is groping towards is WP:NOBLECAUSE.—S Marshall T/C 20:38, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.