Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citation needed (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. BD2412 T 23:36, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable because that there are no significant coverage that are from reliable and independent. It would be great if someone could also do a source assessment table because I don't know how to make one.The creeper2007^Talk! ^{Be well, stay safe} 22:49, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@The creeper2007: Do you note that it's already the third nomination? I recommend you look at the second nomination. Σαν μο σα^{The Trve Lawe of free Monarchies} 23:52, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A Wikipedia policy that only has coverage from KnowYourMeme (of which there are thousands of memes listed, most without WP pages) is an obvious notability fail. I-82-I | TALK 01:03, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious keep Peaceray's rationale in this article's second nomination said it far better than I possibly could, so I'll simply say that, from a cursory glance at the article, I would hardly consider Deutsche Welle or Variety to be unreliable in any case, especially when this is regarding a pop culture reference. OhKayeSierra (talk) 01:06, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The previous nomination was a year and a half ago, and closed as Keep, with many sources listed. Nothing has changed since late 2018, and the nominator does not explain why the recent consensus is invalid. — Toughpigs (talk) 01:18, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We need to avoid navel gazing. An article about something on Wikipedia itself needs much better sourcing than what we see here to justify it existing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:19, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Nothing has changed since the last nomination. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 21:13, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems like it passes GNG to me.★Trekker (talk) 17:07, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.