User talk:Takeru Watanabe

This is Takeru Watanabe's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Merano Poetry Prize (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Possibly notable, but the sources cited are not enough to establish this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Merano Poetry Prize and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Takeru Watanabe! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DoubleGrazing! Thank you for the review. May I ask what would be a suitable source in this case? The Merano Poetry Prize is very well known in the German-spaeking world and higly prestigious. Ich would certainly like to look for additional suitable sources. So if possible please give me a hint. Takeru Watanabe Takeru Watanabe (talk) 14:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We need to see at least three sources that meet the WP:GNG standard, namely secondary published sources (books, newspapers, magazines, TV or radio programmes, etc.) that are both reliable and entirely independent of the subject, and that have of their own volition (not 'sponsored' content, advertorial, based on press releases, etc.) provided significant coverage of the subject. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is very helpful for me. Thank you very much! Best, Takeru Watanabe (talk) 19:34, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Following your advice, I have added new sources. In case you would like to have a look: Draft:Merano Poetry Prize Best! Takeru Watanabe (talk) 18:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Judith Zander has been accepted

Judith Zander, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniela Seel has been accepted

Daniela Seel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 06:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kerstin Preiwuß (May 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.lyrik-empfehlungen.de/2013/empfehlungen/kerstin-preiwuss-rede. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Kerstin Preiwuß may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:48, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kerstin Preiwuß has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kerstin Preiwuß. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anja Utler has been accepted

Anja Utler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 10:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for reviewing my draft and for creating the article "Anja Utler"! Takeru Watanabe (talk) 17:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kerstin Becker has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kerstin Becker. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, Takeru Watanabe, and welcome to Women in Red. It good to see you intend to create more biographies of women. You can find guidance in connection with translations at Help:Translation and further advice on writing women's biographies in our essays. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ipigott, thank you very much for your welcoming message, for your tips and for your kind offer of assistance. I'm looking very much forward to participating in the project. Best, Takeru Watanabe (talk) 17:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ipigott, you kindly offered your assistence back in May. I've submitted my Draft:Mara-Daria Cojocaru recently and today it has been declined by User:Greenman (talk contribs‎): please see the stated reasons down below. What I don't understand is that there is no birth date in the draft about Cojocaru, only a birth year which is easily to verify via the external links. Also, my draft already uses reliable sources. I don't see how I could possibly give additional sources that are even more reliable. Please have a look at this, I could really use your advice. Best, Takeru Watanabe (talk) 20:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Takeru Watanabe: Please read the guideline I referred to, WP:BLP. References for living people are required to be inline. Statements being verified in an external link somewhere is not sufficient, and even in cases where they are not required, inline citations are far preferable. Why expect readers to have to look elsewhere? Greenman (talk) 21:52, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Greenman, thank you for your reply. I'm familiar with the guideline WP:BLP. But also, I find multiple Wikipedia articles not giving inline references for birth dates or birth years, for example the following: Daniel Kehlmann, Thomas Bernhard and Ann Cotten. Anyway, I think it does make sense to give a reference for a birth date that is easily accessible. So I'm going to add one reliable source for the birth date of Cojocaru inline. Concerning additional required sources I would be grateful if you could give me a hint to what in your oppinion is still missing or required. Best, Takeru Watanabe (talk) 09:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red June 2024

Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310

Online events:

New: LGBTQ+ women | Wiki Loves Pride | Women in Music | Alphabet run X, Y & Z

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

Women in Green Good Article Edit-a-thon June 2024 - Going Back in Time
The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref - May 15th to June 5th

Tip of the month:

Find a Grave is NOT a reliable source (as it is user-generated content). It can be used
to look for biographical clues.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

..Ipigott (talk) 08:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kerstin Preiwuß has been accepted

Kerstin Preiwuß, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 18:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for re-reviewing my draft and for creating the article "Kerstin Preiwuß"! Takeru Watanabe (talk) 19:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kerstin Becker has been accepted

Kerstin Becker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theroadislong! Thank you very much for kindly reviewing my draft and for creating the article "Kerstin Becker". Best, Takeru Watanabe (talk) 19:08, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2024

Women in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313

Online events:

New: Translation contest 2024 | Science Fiction and Fantasy | Women in Sports

Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative)

Announcements from other communities

Wiki Loves Sport 2024 22 July - 22 September

Tip of the month:

A foreign language biography does not guarantee notability for English Wikipedia.
Check the guidelines before you start.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 14:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Slata Roschal has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Slata Roschal. Thanks! Hitro talk 12:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HitroMilanese! Thank you very much for your comment and your helpful hint. Gladly, I'm going to add reliable sources for the "Biography" section. Thanks again! Best, Takeru Watanabe (talk) 12:06, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slata Roschal has been accepted

Slata Roschal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 16:31, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HitroMilanese! Thank you very much for your support, for reviewing my draft and creating the article. Best, Takeru Watanabe (talk) 21:08, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mara-Daria Cojocaru (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:BLP. Statements, starting with the date of birth, need to be sourced or removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mara-Daria Cojocaru and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 17:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Merano Poetry Prize (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Youknowwhoistheman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Merano Poetry Prize and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Youknow? (talk) 15:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Youknowwhoistheman, thank you for your re-review of my draft. Unfortunately, I do not quite understand what kind of additional sources I'm supposed to add. Do you mean the sources already given are not enough (concerning their number)? Or do you consider the quality of the sources not sufficient? I have looked at other literature prizes for German poetry and I find my draft quite good in comparison. For example, the Ernst Meister Preis für Lyrik only gives three references and the Peter-Huchel-Preis only six references that are not more in-depth or reliable than the ones given by me. Please help me out so that I can further improve the draft. Best, Takeru Watanabe (talk) 19:44, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]