Jump to content

User talk:HelixxUnderscore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A belated welcome!

[edit]
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, HelixxUnderscore! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! clpo13(talk) 23:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi HelixxUnderscore! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:54, Monday, November 15, 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi HelixxUnderscore! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How do I find citations?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

Click this link to read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, you can create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi HelixxUnderscore! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, how do i clse an rfd i started by myself, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus edit warring notification

[edit]

Stop it. -- Valjean (talk) 17:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your frustration, however you were edit warring with another user. I am not trying to support the subject of the article you're edit warring on, just want to make this clear. HelixxUnderscore (talk) 17:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You may wish to read WP:DTTR. Two reverts is not edit warring, under most circumstances. Acroterion (talk) 18:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry HelixxUnderscore (talk) 18:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It "takes two to tangle", and the IP is now blocked for edit warring. You need to look at the situation before handing out a warning. Large edits like that are never accepted without discussion and a consensus. The talk page comments and edit summaries used by the IP showed a very invested editor making tendentious edits and comments.[1] -- Valjean (talk) 18:57, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging pages for speedy deletion

[edit]

Hello, HelixxUnderscore,

Please stop tagging pages for speedy deletion, you are not experienced enough to know how to do it properly. For example, stale drafts are tagged or deleted as CSD G13 six months after they received their last human edit to the exact date and time and you are tagging them too early. Please look at the page history to see when they were last edited and remember, we go by UTC time on Wikipedia, not your local time. For example, if you live in the United States, you need to take into account whether the time was Daylight Savings Time six month ago or not and whether or not that applies to the current day. The reason that we are so particular is that there are many editors and admins keeping watch over expiring drafts and keeping to a few simple rules that we all follow keeps things from getting chaotic.

But honestly, much more editing experience and knowing, really knowing well, the different Criteria for Speedy Deletion and when they apply and to which namespace they apply is required before you start tagging pages for deletion. But if you are interested in doing this type of work in the future, consider applying to Wikipedia:New pages patrol where you can learn from more experienced editors and become involved with evaluating the suitability of recently created pages. Thank you for all of your contributions. Liz Read! Talk! 00:04, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging the lead

[edit]

Hi, HelixxUnderscore,

I removed your edit to Trans man, because it was not an improvement. The lead of an article is just a summary of the most important points of the body, and when those points are already cited and explained in detail in the body, there is no need to duplicate citations, or every detail, in the lead as well; that's why your {{by whom}} tag was unnecessary, because the body already explained it. Hope this helps, Mathglot (talk) 09:26, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]