Jump to content

User talk:Airtuna08

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Airtuna08 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'd like to request to be unblocked. It's been almost 18 months since I was and the ArbCom said I could after 12. I ask that my long and good history be looked at before all this crap that happened on my computer took place. I have my own place now with only me having access to this computer. I will also only use it here, so I don't expect any trouble. If there is, I can easily be blocked again for life. But I assure you I will be a fine contributor to Wiki yet again. Thanks! I can't really post anywhere so some guidance on what I should do here or what is expected would be great. -Airtuna08 (talk) 01:42, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Since this was previously reviewed via ArbCom, please email your request to arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. They should be the ones to review the request through that means rather than this template which is generally more targeted towards administrators. only (talk) 12:08, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Airtuna08 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

See reasons below. It's been 6 years now. I could've easily just created a new account by now but would like my original account so I can contribute to articles I had contributed mightily to before restored. I had a shared computer then. I have my own laptop that only I use now. Thanks!

Decline reason:

Again, a procedural decline for the same reason as your request from Feb, 2014. Yamla (talk) 22:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: Ok, I think it's clear what I need to do. I emailed ArbCom. Thank you for the time! --Airtuna08 (talk) 14:05, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: I emailed ArbCom a few weeks ago and have not gotten a response. Even after a few followups. Can someone assist, please? Thanks! --Airtuna08 (talk) 10:38, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No. I am not a member of ArbCom and there's nothing I can do for you if they decide not to take action. --Yamla (talk) 11:04, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Yamla: Did not know if there was a better way to reach them. It's been a few years :). --Airtuna08 (talk) 00:30, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not as far as I am aware, but honestly, you've had more contact with ArbCom than I have. --Yamla (talk) 12:20, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom unblock appeal

[edit]

The Arbitration Committee has carefully considered the appeal of Airtuna08 (talk · contribs) and has declined to unblock that account and related accounts either known or discovered during the investigation. After six months of not editing Wikipedia under any account including IP accounts the user may again apply to have the block reviewed.

For the Arbitration Committee. SilkTork ✔Tea time 15:56, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking

[edit]

Declined unblock requests must not be removed from user talk pages while still blocked, so I have reverted your blanking of this page. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:07, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have also partially reverted a blanking for the same reason. You can blank the other content, but as Boing! says just above this comment, the block-related material has to stay put. Imzadi 1979  02:13, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And it's been restored again. Sorry, it has to stay. Imzadi 1979  22:16, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]