Template talk:List navbox

	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Lists This template is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles

{{editprotected}}

Either directly or via a doc page.

 Done Cheers, PeterSymonds (talk) 15:11, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}}

Both of the categories that were added to this page (Category:Navbox templates and Category:Navboxes) are redirects. Please remove them and add the page to Category:Navbox (navigational) templates instead. --Russ (talk) 17:35, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done HotCat has its flaws. :) Cheers, PeterSymonds (talk) 20:16, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{editprotected}} Please add

|state = {{{state|autocollapse}}}

under the |name line, to add the option for non-collapsing this box. Thanks. -- Quiddity (talk) 21:16, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense,  Done. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:10, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{edit protected}} Please add "PAGENAME" sortkey. Thanks. --Funandtrvl (talk) 18:52, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:08, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please examine this change and correct the behavior of this template so that all the section headings are flush left, with all the contributions intact.
I am watching Template talk:List navbox for replies. -- Wavelength (talk) 03:10, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
User talk:Noetica did not have this problem at 16:20, 29 October 2009. I am adding the template here for a demonstration.

-- Wavelength (talk) 05:34, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This section is for demonstrating the behavior of the template in the previous section. At this time, the template affects the left margin of this section. -- Wavelength (talk) 05:34, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]