Jump to content

Talk:Waterfront Trail

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo wtrail.png

[edit]

Image:Logo wtrail.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cities

[edit]

I google mapped the trail, and I don't see any evidence where the trail continues past Cornwall, and into South Glengarry. At best it touches the municipal border line. Until the trail legitimately proceeds into South Glengarry significantly, I would suggest removing it from the Cities table. SquashEngineer (talk) 18:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uses

[edit]

What evidence could possibly be offered to justify the statement that "The rising costs of automobiles and gasoline mean a heavier burden on the trail system?" How would somehow rationalize the use of a remote, and poorly connected biking trail over the use of a vehicle for completely incompatible purposes? Other than some anecdotal notion that driving is somehow more expensive than biking, utilization of the trail for anything other than completely non-essential simple recreation, would not justify such a comparative statement. I sincerely doubt this trail system is EVER "heavily burdened." If anything, the trails are likely severely under utilised 99% of the time other than during July and August, in all locations but the most populated areas in and around major urban centres. SquashEngineer (talk) 18:20, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]