Talk:Person Pitch

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Albums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles Alternative music Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: http://www.noripcord.com/features/top-50-albums-2007-part-two http://www.noripcord.com/features/top-100-albums-2000-2009-part-six-40-21 https://web.archive.org/web/20071220201123/http://stylusmagazine.com/reviews/panda-bear/person-pitch.htm https://web.archive.org/web/20080208124443/http://www.stylusmagazine.com/articles/weekly_article/panda-bear-the-stylus-interview.htm https://archive.org/details/punk_planet_80/page/n115/mode/2up?view=theater https://exclaim.ca/music/article/panda_bear-person_pitch https://themorningnews.org/article/the-top-10-albums-of-2007 "Best Album of 2007". Stereogum. Archived from the original on December 13, 2007. Retrieved June 6, 2022. https://web.archive.org/web/20071213233142/http://www.stereogum.com/gummys/2007/best-video.html https://web.archive.org/web/20071214094639/http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1576284/20071211/id_0.jhtml https://web.archive.org/web/20071220190236/http://www.emusic.com/lists/showlist.html?lid=25803040 https://web.archive.org/web/20071216120949/http://www.spin.com/features/magazine/best_of_2007/albums/30-21/ https://music.mxdwn.com/2008/01/25/reviews/panda-bear-person-pitch/ https://music.mxdwn.com/2007/12/31/features/mxdwn-top-50-songs-2007/ https://music.mxdwn.com/2007/12/31/features/mxdwn-top-30-albums-2007/ https://music.mxdwn.com/2009/12/31/features/mxdwns-favorite-albums-of-the-decade/ https://floodmagazine.com/42527/2017-anticipated/

Is that influences section really necessary? It's huge. Zopwx2 05:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reckon there is an argument for it - it is an interesting part of the total package. It's much easier to read here than the version printed in the booklet/sleeve. LRJP! 20:28, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The producer is "chuck"? I thought Panda Bear produced this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.54.101 (talk) 15:20, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]