Talk:Pechengsky District

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Russia: History / Military / Human geography Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the history of Russia task force. This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force. This article is supported by the human geography of Russia task force. Soviet Union: Military Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force. Finland Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Patsamo is Finnish territory. Russia forced Finland to cede Patsamo to itself. It is not according to free will of Finland. This is a typical aggresive action just like a robber using a rifle to force a person to give a lot of money to him. Shame on Russia. I ultimately understand why Russia is the largest country in the world.59.112.80.67 (talk) 08:48, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it doesn't change the fact that Russia own's it now. So let's keep this thing sourced and let's not fall into propagandic fervor.--Whiskey (talk) 08:52, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Finland was Hitler's Germany ally. Losers pay for their wrong decisions. As Japan gave lands to Soviets and USA, China etc. You were Hitler allies, have you a shame to talk about aggression? And Petsamo was not given into Soviet hands after Soviet invasion, it was given practically in the end of World War II. If we talk about territories all countries own in the world - we can say - USA needs to give back all land to Indians and go back to England. Lithuanians need to give back Vilnius to Poland. France needs to give back some territories to Germany etc. etc. etc. But it's nonsense, so stop talking silly things, please. History is writen by winners. By the way, Finland was first in contacting Soviets in 1944. They feared of war, so they wanted a peace. So it is like you are going to robber and giving your money to him, fearing that it will happen in the future, so let's do this faster. But as finns helped Hitler to blockade Leningrad (1 million Leningrad citizens died in blockade), so it is a right thing they must pay for their wrong decisions. Ok, i know Soviets done lot of bad things too, but it is war. No one is sweet and white. In Soviet favor is speaking that Hitler with allies were attacking Soviets first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.84.1.247 (talk) 14:22, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

https://parentztalk.com/bandoned-extraordinar-ta/?twclid=2-3k33qtan2wdwgnp7nqtagpz35#5 2601:1C0:8301:7EF0:194F:4338:8843:6174 (talk) 04:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page claims that the Rajakoski area is 169 square kilometers, but the Finnish speaking page at https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inari claims it is 7 km² larger i.e. 176 km². Likewise, the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayakoski also claims 169 km². Does any of you knows which is true out of this mess? Thanks! 130.238.112.129 (talk) 17:51, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]