Jump to content

Talk:Kehinde Wiley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 January 2019 and 17 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kamari Bell. Peer reviewers: Mfarmer26, BLTownsend02.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

[edit]

Although I don't feel I have enough information to edit the article, Wiley is notable. He has been featured in the Believer magazine and will be a part of "Recognize! Hip Hop and Contemporary Portraiture" at the Smithsonian Institute from Feb. 8 through Oct. 26, according to Paste Magazine (Feb 2008). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.178.187 (talk) 15:40, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wiley's painting Le Roi a la Chasse is displayed in the permanent collection of the Blanton Museum of Art at the University of Texas in Austin. I agree he is sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.--Euthman (talk) 18:42, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could we get some more pictures?

[edit]

...especially the ones from An Economy of Grace? It would be great to get some pics of the models, the dresses, the dress designers, and a list of the PD works referenced as well. We could use this for the Art& Feminism wikiproject. Jane (talk) 11:46, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gay

[edit]

Wiley is gay, this is all over the net, see for example http://dot429.com/articles/1436-kehinde-wiley-gay-artist-shattering-concepts-of-normalcy So you should add a tag of LGBT at the bottom — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.182.117.162 (talk) 08:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This article says that Wiley identifies as bisexual. This is incorrect. Both of the sources cited say he identifies as gay. In the second source he says he is not bisexual.

Ineffabletuesday (talk) 02:50, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Racist

[edit]

Many people believe Wiley is racist just because he chooses to only paint portraits of African American/black people. I can assure you that he is not. The reason that he only paints black/African american people is because this is the essence of his art. You wouldn't ever think to see a black person on a great white stallion, wearing gold jewelry, and showing the power that they have. Kehinde wants and needs us to start thinking this way. Damn, is 2016 and people are still going crazy about racism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.57.23.82 (talk) 20:18, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that he can only project Black Power by copying and reappropriating classical notions ingrained in European imagery usurps everything he claims to be about! 2001:8003:70F5:2400:4438:7235:2181:C9E6 (talk) 23:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How about the fact he paints pictures of blacks swinging around severed heads of whites? 71.185.227.209 (talk) 14:50, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kehinde Wiley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kehinde Wiley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Organization of article

[edit]

DynaGirl The only content I removed was duplicate information about Wiley being selected to paint Obama, which is now redundant as the painting has its own section. Most of the references was simply about Wiley selected,but if some of them have valuable other information they can of course be included elsewhere in the article. Otherwise, I do think the paintings sections should follow directly after the Career section, they are kind of subsection to his overall painting career. Personal life should be near the end, not in the middle, and it's also normal to have recognition at the end.Iselilja (talk) 17:01, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I seem to have misread the edit summary interpreting the moved material as being deleted from the article. I restored your reorganization. --DynaGirl (talk) 17:10, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File Deleted from Commons

[edit]
The file c:File:Portrait of President Barack Obama by Kehinde Wiley.jpg used in this article has been deleted from Commons

Message automatically deposited by a robot - -JamuthiraR (talk) 17:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Obama portrait

[edit]

I've redirected Barack Obama (Wiley) to this article, for now, but a standalone article may be possible given the amount of coverage. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:35, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update: See President Barack Obama (painting). ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:14, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for photo?

[edit]

There's already a photo … so I've removed the request for a photo, as it is obviously not needed. Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 09:52, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Who paints Kehinde's Paintings?

[edit]

The vast majority of Kehinde's work is undertaken by workshops of dozens of uncredited Chinese assistants who churn out paintings based on his 'ideas'. It would be interesting to ascertain to what degree Kehinde contributes to each of his works and whether such credit is warranted if that contribution is less than (say) 50%. It is also a story that speaks to the nature of modern art; the Gallery and Retail space that encourages the fabrication of factory-made 'art' that sells off of celebrity rather than any inherit value. The level of artistic ownership that supposedly differentiates between the $500,000 'original' and the $50 copy available at any asian tourist hotspot is becoming increasingly intangible. This is especially relevant to Kehinde as most of his work is reimagined derivatives of other peoples work. 2001:8003:70F5:2400:4438:7235:2181:C9E6 (talk) 23:11, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Issues in Contemporary Art

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 August 2022 and 6 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Just elane (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Artsysomeone (talk) 02:25, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:07, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]