Jump to content

Talk:Jeffrey Wigand

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Interview shelved?

[edit]

His website says CBS shelved his interview. What does that mean? --Gbleem 17:25, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CBS faced a potential law suit from B & W due to Jeffrey Wigand's violation of his non-disclosure agreement so they initially decided not to air the interview. According to http://www.jeffreywigand.com/60minutes.php"It was originally scheduled months earlier, but was delayed and almost buried completely. It wasn't until the Wall Street Journal published Dr. Wigand's Mississippi testimony that CBS reconsidered, and allowed the show to run." --Pete Gas (talk) 16:05, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 17:03, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship?

[edit]

For a subject as corporate-sensitive as nicotine manipulation, this article is surprisingly scarce. Can somebody see if there's maybe some malicious editing going on here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.234.34.25 (talk) 14:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life

[edit]

There should be some information about his family. According to the The Insider (film), his wife filed for a divorce. What happened to his daughters? etc. 61.8.149.69 (talk) 13:30, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed?

[edit]

Big Tobacco still at work? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.213.52.85 (talk) 04:49, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"intentionally manipulated"

[edit]

a [specify] tag was added to this phrase with the edit comment "no source reference is given for 'intentionally manipulated' effects of nicotine, so is there for just hearsay, or opinion; lacks neutrality". I read this sentence in the article as a statement of what Wigand actually said; the lack of neutrality is expected, as it is his opinion, so I am removing the tag. Robsavoie (talk) 23:53, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jeffrey Wigand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:24, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]