Jump to content

Talk:Democratic Army of Greece

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I have translated this text from the Greek article, but have not yet learned to apply formatting and links etc. Any help would be appreciated. kritikos99 15:08, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I should perhaps also say that the author's views do not necessarily coincide with my own, and it might be appropriate for someone to vet this article for neutrality. kritikos99 15:10, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The neutrality tag

[edit]

On what grounds was this tag placed? This is a small article with just some basic facts, no strong views on anything. I'm changing it to 'citations needed'. --Treiskaitetarto 06:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, i have to agree with the translator. It might be a small article but has some serious POV issues. I will take a better look at some time to see how it can get better. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.168.62.198 (talk) 01:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Neutrality

[edit]

This article is seriously pro-communist. For example it says that EAM was followed by most of the Greek people and it does not offer any empirical evidence for this assertion (it is immensely unlikely that this is true) it also calls the anti-Communist groups "terrorists" which is fully POV

EAM and DSA had a core of communists but most of their members were just socialists, democrats and people that did not like the nazi and then British occupation. So, it is fair to say that i was followed by most of the Greek people and it was the legitimate government. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.74.251.110 (talk) 11:47, August 21, 2007 (UTC)

This article reads liek a RIZOSPASTIS article, it needs a serious overhaul with balanced sources!! Rastapopoulos 07:07, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Full remake of the Article

[edit]

It is obvious that the first approach was made very hasty and -yes- it was biased.

It was not acceptable as a historical approach.

I didn't changed it a lot - just put in more historical milestones in order to expand the article and fill it up with all the necessary info.

Although biased, a good skeleton can be the http://www.politikokafeneio.com/dse/dse.htm .

We can start working on it section by section and expanded to something that presents all the aspects.

I am open to suggestions.

Dkace (talk) 13:01, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]