Jump to content

Talk:Canons Regular of the Order of the Holy Cross

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Double articles

[edit]

There are two articles with exactly the same content. Williamb (talk) 03:36, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

proposed merger

[edit]

I just noticed the below comment, which was inserted in the actual article (below the proposed-merger box) on June 28, 2009. (I agree with the comment, which opposes a merger. Eagle4000 (talk) 20:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC)) I undid the edit and have copied the comment here:[reply]

"No, a merging would not be a good move; they would appear to be two entirely different orgainisations."

And two different organizations they are... This comment should be removed. A way of making things clearer would be to remane this article "Crosiers," with "Canons Regular of the Order of the Holy Cross as a subitle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.26.150.143 (talk) 20:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Two entirely different organizations but with similar names. This article discusses the Canons Regular of the Order of the Holy Cross (Crosiers) or OSC. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.206.181.61 (talk) 15:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the merge tag. I'm also moving the other article to have the groups full title (including "of Coimbra" part) to avoid this confusion in the future. Dondegroovily (talk) 13:54, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

[edit]

I have reverted the work of Bpowell710 (talk · contribs) because of several problems it introduced. For one, the new content was not wikified at all. There were no links to other articles. Also, it removed all categories and interwiki links that had been assigned to the page. It also removed the one reference that had been there and replaced it with non-inline references. If you wish to make such sweeping changes to an article then you should discuss them and achieve consensus first before undertaking the work. I also tagged the article with {{refimprove}} because, as it stands, it only contains one reference. Elizium23 (talk) 19:30, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move reverted

[edit]

Since there is more than one religious order called "Crosiers" it is wrong to call this one by an ambiguous name. The other articles on specific Crosiers institutes have fully-specified names, so it is WP:CONSISTENT to keep this one fully-qualified as well. Elizium23 (talk) 13:10, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]