Jump to content

Talk:Antonio Rosmini

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why Serbati?

[edit]

If I consider that the Rosminians themselves call him Rosmini, that a search in Amazon shows a string of titles by or on Rosmini, that the main street of his native town is yclept 'corso Rosmini', I see no reason for this page to keep the rare (and that's being generous) Rosmini-Serbati. I will wait for a couple of days - just to see if there are valid arguments against it. Tridentinus 09:58, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As an historically important fact, I plead for keeping this person's privileged rank of Rovereto nobility as connoted by the double-barrelled Serbati name? Mingardi's translation keeps it also. The worldview of a constitutional legal scholar as exercised in a persons character is key, and formed as much by ecclesiastical concepts of justice from his holy orders (ie ordained status as priest) as customary civil responsibilities and assumptions thereof held as a result of his aristocratic upbringing. Indeed the combination makes for the intriguing genius of this venerable person himself! (MrsKrishan (talk) 23:22, 9 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Another question - can anyone confirm or deny possible vandalism under "Works" (see 'piefology by Anonymous) (MrsKrishan (talk) 23:22, 9 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Antonio Rosmini-Serbati. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]