Jump to content

Talk:ATS-3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Defending image

[edit]

The Image was infact orignally published by NASA, so it shouldnt be a problem to leave it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theinternetsoify (talkcontribs) 10:26, March 17, 2008

File:Ats-3 test tx.ogg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Ats-3 test tx.ogg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:31, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An even longer-lived satellite?

[edit]

The LES 9 satellite, launched in March 1976, is now over 36 years old and still operating. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesmrader (talkcontribs) 07:55, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good info. Not sure it is relevant to this article as that sat would be a 3rd or 4th generation commsat. In the late 1990's, apparently ATS-3 had the record, although the sources are a bit unclear as I wasn't able to find a publication date for the NASA "Beyond the Ionosphere" book. However, I have tweaked the text in this article to indicate that the oldest claim was made at a snapshot in time, and is certainly not eternally true. Cheers. N2e (talk) 21:45, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ATS-3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:34, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ATS-3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:45, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]