Jump to content

Talk:2008 Akihabara massacre

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Akihabara massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 25 external links on Akihabara massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 17 external links on Akihabara massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:45, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Additional sources

[edit]

Found from the Japan Times http://web.archive.org/web/20081222071716/http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20080609x1.html WhisperToMe (talk) 16:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 September 2022

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved  — Amakuru (talk) 12:33, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Akihabara massacre2008 Akihabara massacre – Per current naming convention on events (WP:NCEVENTS), adding a when before the where and what is desirable in a majority of cases. I don't see a reason to make an exception for this article. This would also align the article title with other naming convention-compliant Tokyo-related attacks, such as 1974 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries bombing, 2019 Tokyo car attack, and October 2021 Tokyo attack, making this article title WP:CONSISTENT with similar ones and with the List of vehicle-ramming attacks. Pilaz (talk) 13:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hikikomori?

[edit]

"Based on Katō's messages, commentators referred to the incident as another case of Japan's hikikomori becoming more violent and suicidal."

This sentence from the article seems wrong to me. Katō was a obviously not a hikikomori - he had a steady job outside his home, for instance. The articles cited as support do not say that he was a hikikomori either, they just cite this case in a more global discussion of the impact of social isolation on violence or suicide. This sentence could be changed to something like "as another case of a lonely person in Japan becoming more violent and suicidal." But then, this is already expressed in the rest of the article and hardly necessary to repeat with three sources here. Should we just remove that sentence? Alestane (talk) 01:50, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]