Jump to content

Talk:1986 New York Giants season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1986 New York Giants season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 29, 2007Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 21, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the New York Giants of the NFL won the first Super Bowl in their franchise history during their 1986 season?

Okay

[edit]

Okay, I started this baby up today and nominated it for DYK? I'll try to get it GA level by the end of the week. Quadzilla99 22:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I nominated it for GA, I'm going to expand it some more tomorrow. Not bad for one day. Quadzilla99 00:06, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA review comment

[edit]

here we go again. i am assuming you made mods in this article on my comments from 1990 New York Giants season. * I checked on the reference-1, it requires registration to access the article. the same needs to be mentioned in the notes/link

* Needs team staff details

* "Highlights of the game included Cowboys running back Herschel Walker, in his first season in the NFL, rushing 10 times for 64 yards and the game-winning touchdown" - you only included one highlight. re-word sentence or add data

* "Linebacker Harry Carson scored his first career touchdown on a fake field goal in the third quarter" - that is interesting. can you provide details? was he the holder, was he the receiver or did he run the ball in. the reason for the curiosity is that carson is a LB and i am not sure that i have seen a lot of LBs score TD on fake field goal attempts

    • Doesn't give a description, but it does say he caught a pass for the touchdown, so I made that clear. Most likely the holder caught the ball, then got up and threw the pass to Carson. Carson probably lined as a blocker and snuck out of the line of scrimmage to run a pass pattern. Quadzilla99 05:26, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

* "defense sacked Eagles' quarterbacks Ron Jaworski and Randall Cunningham three times each" - why were 2 QBs used by the eagles? was one injuired? or pulled for poor play?

* "With the victory the Giants completed their second five game winning streak of the season, several of them in close contests; the margin of victory in those five gasmes were 7, 3, 3, 2 and 3 points.[29] The game was played in front of 75,116 fans at Giants Stadium, and marked the Giants fifth conscutive victory." - lot of redundancy here. the first line talks of a five game streak and so does the last line. remove one of them. also, "several of them" is followed by a specific number (five gasmes in Enghlish or games in English - trying to be funny!). remove one of them.

  • How many MNF games did the giants play? i think that should go in the lead para
    • I don't think is really that important from a long term historical perspective really. Do you? Quadzilla99 15:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • Comment. If I could add a comment regarding Monday night games. Since it is a showcase game, teams that do better are preferentially placed in the Monday night slot. However, since the schedule is determined in preseason, this is judged on the prior season's performance. In my opinion, it is notable if a strong team did not have a primetime (this era, Monday night only) appearance, but my feeling is its too incidental for a lede placement, and may even be marginally notable in the article. —Twigboy 16:15, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • OK, i guess i botched this one. In my first study of the article, i thought i counted three MNF apperances and thus wanted the info in the lead para. when i re-read the article, i noticed that there were MNF appearance. Though i dont have data in hand, i felt that 3 MNF appeances in the season was something noteworthy for a team to have and thus the request for mention in lead para.

* I think you should mention it was Parcell's first CoY and i think LT's second. Please mention it in the article

    • Fixed. That was Taylor's only MVP but he won his third Defensive Player fo the Year Award that year. I added that. Three is still the most by anybody incidentally. Quadzilla99 18:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, pro-bowl and regular season awards needs to be a sub-section under regular season and not the first para in post-season

* "The Giants advanced to play" could be changed to "The Giants played"**Fixed. Quadzilla99 18:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC) Please make suitable mods and i shall be glad to make the article GA level. As with the previous article, this one needs photos and then can be sent to FA. Kalyan 17:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs closure for FAC

[edit]

The following details are required before the article can go to FAC:

  • Needs team staff details
  • "Linebacker Harry Carson scored his first career touchdown on a fake field goal in the third quarter" - that is interesting. can you provide details? was he the holder, was he the receiver or did he run the ball in. the reason for the curiosity is that carson is a LB and i am not sure that i have seen a lot of LBs score TD on fake field goal attempts
  • MINOR: Also, pro-bowl and regular season awards needs to be a sub-section under regular season and not the first para in post-season
  • Images from the season.
    -- Kalyan 07:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:1986Giants.jpg

[edit]

File:1986Giants.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:00, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New reference

[edit]

Putting this here for now, as it may be useful for source material: The New York Daily News posted a "reprint" of the original 1987 story about the NFC Championship game here.—Twigboy (talk) 17:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment

[edit]

I'm going to keep this as a GA after review. However, refs #2 and 49 are dead links, and I'd prefer that the cite templates are used. However, format-wise they look fine, so I'm not going to push it, though I do think it should be done. Wizardman 02:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:15, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:15, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1986 New York Giants season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on 1986 New York Giants season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:16, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]