User contributions for Scanf
A user with 387 edits. Account created on 18 June 2007.
17 July 2024
- 20:3020:30, 17 July 2024 diff hist 0 m Don't be evil →Use in criticism of Google: Improve ref location for readability
- 20:2520:25, 17 July 2024 diff hist −240 m Don't be evil →Use in criticism of Google: Fixed stray dup and ref location
- 17:5917:59, 17 July 2024 diff hist +215 Don't be evil →Use in criticism of Google: Added 2012 Big Think commentary
12 July 2024
- 11:1111:11, 12 July 2024 diff hist 0 Talk:Don't be evil So the topics of criticism are kept together current
- 09:5709:57, 12 July 2024 diff hist 0 Talk:Don't be evil →Adding Criticism
- 09:5609:56, 12 July 2024 diff hist +15 Talk:Don't be evil →Adding Criticism
- 09:5109:51, 12 July 2024 diff hist +173 Talk:Don't be evil →Adding Criticism: assisting contributor
- 09:4909:49, 12 July 2024 diff hist +25 Talk:Don't be evil →Adding Criticism
- 09:4709:47, 12 July 2024 diff hist 0 m Talk:Don't be evil →Adding Criticism
- 09:4709:47, 12 July 2024 diff hist +10 Talk:Don't be evil →Adding Criticism
- 09:4609:46, 12 July 2024 diff hist −1 Talk:Don't be evil →Adding Criticism
- 09:4509:45, 12 July 2024 diff hist +356 Talk:Don't be evil →Adding Criticism
- 09:0809:08, 12 July 2024 diff hist −1 Talk:Don't be evil Seems to be the most relevant talking point at the moment so I am placing at top.
- 08:5908:59, 12 July 2024 diff hist −11 m Talk:Don't be evil →Adding Criticism: rephrase for clarity
- 08:5108:51, 12 July 2024 diff hist +2 m Talk:Don't be evil →Adding Criticism: rewording for clarity
- 08:4008:40, 12 July 2024 diff hist +6 Talk:Don't be evil →Adding Criticism
- 08:2708:27, 12 July 2024 diff hist +308 Talk:Don't be evil →Adding Criticism: Reply Tag: Reply
- 08:2408:24, 12 July 2024 diff hist +56 Talk:Don't be evil →Adding Criticism
- 08:0508:05, 12 July 2024 diff hist +770 User talk:Maqdisi →Your addition to "Don't Be Evil" (Google): editor feedback current Tag: New topic
- 07:4207:42, 12 July 2024 diff hist +747 Talk:Don't be evil →Adding Criticism: Please keep this section readable and coherent. Thank you. Tag: New topic
- 07:0407:04, 12 July 2024 diff hist −1,223 Don't be evil Please re-phrase and relocate your edit so that it supports this section as a whole, not vice-versa. Unsuitable as concluding statement, relevance to topic needs to be highlighted better.. Undid revision 1233838056 by Maqdisi (talk) Tag: Undo
4 July 2024
- 10:0510:05, 4 July 2024 diff hist −1,223 Don't be evil Please add this to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Google, unless you can cite a usable connection to the motto. But thanks. Tag: Reverted
15 June 2024
- 09:2609:26, 15 June 2024 diff hist +35 Don't be evil →Use in criticism of Google: Full article on WIkipedia
2 June 2024
- 19:2119:21, 2 June 2024 diff hist −231 Don't be evil →Use in criticism of Google: Fix duplicate
- 05:1605:16, 2 June 2024 diff hist +477 Don't be evil →Use in criticism of Google
- 04:3104:31, 2 June 2024 diff hist +13 Don't be evil →Use in criticism of Google: Small but important. USA corps are politically aligning and it is increasingly important to point thing out. Their point is perfectly made IMHO just wish it came from a more neutral source.
- 03:5903:59, 2 June 2024 diff hist +404 Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources →Should CNN be broken into CNN, CNN Politics, and CNN talk shows the same way Fox News is?: Reply Tag: Reply
31 May 2024
- 17:2317:23, 31 May 2024 diff hist +470 Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources →Should CNN be broken into CNN, CNN Politics, and CNN talk shows the same way Fox News is?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:3916:39, 31 May 2024 diff hist +381 Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources →Should CNN be broken into CNN, CNN Politics, and CNN talk shows the same way Fox News is?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 16:0916:09, 31 May 2024 diff hist +525 Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources →Should CNN be broken into CNN, CNN Politics, and CNN talk shows the same way Fox News is?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:5315:53, 31 May 2024 diff hist +653 Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources →Should CNN be broken into CNN, CNN Politics, and CNN talk shows the same way Fox News is?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:1114:11, 31 May 2024 diff hist +341 Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources →Should CNN be broken into CNN, CNN Politics, and CNN talk shows the same way Fox News is?
- 14:0414:04, 31 May 2024 diff hist +39 Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources →Should CNN be broken into CNN, CNN Politics, and CNN talk shows the same way Fox News is?
- 14:0314:03, 31 May 2024 diff hist +384 Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources →Should CNN be broken into CNN, CNN Politics, and CNN talk shows the same way Fox News is?: Reply Tag: Reply
- 12:4912:49, 31 May 2024 diff hist +226 Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources →Why is Al-Jazeera green?: I appreciate the efforts but definitely dont agree with every outcome here. Tag: Reply
- 12:3512:35, 31 May 2024 diff hist +73 Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources →Should CNN be broken into CNN, CNN Politics, and CNN talk shows the same way Fox News is?
- 12:3412:34, 31 May 2024 diff hist +761 Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources →Should CNN be broken into CNN, CNN Politics, and CNN talk shows the same way Fox News is?
- 12:0112:01, 31 May 2024 diff hist +1 m Don't be evil →Use in criticism of Google: wc. admit it does sound better sigh.
- 11:5311:53, 31 May 2024 diff hist +863 Don't be evil →Use in criticism of Google: Added anti-trust concerns expressed under the motto
24 May 2024
- 00:5000:50, 24 May 2024 diff hist +206 Talk:Don't be evil →Criticism: Reply Tag: Reply
23 May 2024
- 15:2115:21, 23 May 2024 diff hist +209 Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Independent Australia: Reply Tag: Reply
- 05:4005:40, 23 May 2024 diff hist +26 m Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Independent Australia: Specify topic better make easier for others here ;)
- 05:1905:19, 23 May 2024 diff hist −86 Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →Independent Australia
- 05:1705:17, 23 May 2024 diff hist +34 Talk:Don't be evil →Criticism
- 00:2500:25, 23 May 2024 diff hist +390 Talk:Don't be evil →Criticism
22 May 2024
- 15:0915:09, 22 May 2024 diff hist +254 Don't be evil Undid revision 1225041437 by Skyring (talk) mediabiasfactcheck.com disagrees "favors the left and HIGH for factual reporting due to proper sourcing" https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/independent-australia/ pls elaborate RS Tags: Undo Reverted
19 May 2024
- 12:0112:01, 19 May 2024 diff hist +7 m Don't be evil →Use in criticism of Google
- 12:0012:00, 19 May 2024 diff hist −2 m Don't be evil →Use in criticism of Google: "promote" is wrong, "shape" (or "control") is better
- 11:2611:26, 19 May 2024 diff hist +4 m Don't be evil →Use in criticism of Google: Add resource link
- 11:1011:10, 19 May 2024 diff hist +33 Don't be evil →Use in criticism of Google: Insert link Criticism of Google#Politics for more info. Keep this motto-related.
