Talk:Divinyls

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Nqr9 in topic Songwriting collaborations

Buffy soundtrack

edit

Mention should also be made of their other US hit 'Ain't gonna eat out my heart anymore' from the Buffy Sountrack. 60.226.111.150 12:53, 4 February 2006

Charlie Drayton

edit

Need to link to more info on Charlie Drayton, who is a very interesting musician. Although he often drums for Divinyls, he is better known as a bass player, and his credits are huge.Leeborkman 01:42, 28 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Divinyls... plural

edit

Just an explanation. Xanzzibar changed "Divinyls are" to "Divinyls is", and I reverted to "Divinyls are". There are three reasons for this... First, because in Australia, we generally follow British grammar, and the convention in British English is to use plural verb with a musical group. Second, because in both British and American English, a plural-seeming band name, by convention, takes a plural verb. See American_and_British_English_Differences, where this is put more succinctly. And third, because "Divinyls is", even if it were correct, is decidedly unnatural to my ears. Hope that's okay. Leeborkman 14:14, 3 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I would support you 100%. Another example : "The Beatles were a British band", not "The Beatles was a British band. :-) Rossrs 14:25, 3 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
I read somewhere the simple, common-sense test. If you would call the band "they", then use plural. If you would call the band "it", then use singular. "Remember the Divinyls? It was a great band." YUCK. "Remember the Divinyls? They were a great band". YES. Leeborkman 23:50, 3 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Divinyls

edit

folks, for the last time, just because a band doesn't put a "the" before it's name on record covers (see the ramones, the pixies, the eagles, or the eurythmics) doesn't mean you don't say it. this is a matter of common sense, people. [www.youtubeindir.com/tag__McEntee__1.html] 67.172.61.222 19:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Err, Divinyls are NOT one hit wonders! Where the HECK do you get such an incorrect idea?? They have had many hit albums and singles over the past 20 years!

Please correct this erroneous information! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.167.159.169 (talkcontribs) 08:17, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Proposed major edits

edit

I intend further wikifying this article including adding in-line refs, sectioning and tidying up. The process may take one to two weeks and interim stages may look disorganised / incomplete but hopefully I will be able to get it up to B-class. I expect my first major edit will be in one or two days.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 07:03, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

3rd major edit completed, hopefully the refs support more of the content and sectioning has improved. I'm not entirely happy with the Lead, the band members list and the soundtrack subsection. A good legal photo would help. Notwithstanding these criticisms I believe it is now B class.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 06:54, 31 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
The article still needs major work. The intro fails to do its job, launching into song and video details (some of which are incorrect) that are not needed at this point. Poor grammar and punctuation abound. I'll look at this as time permits. Grimhim (talk) 04:16, 6 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Re-rating article to reflect extent of changes needed. Grimhim (talk) 04:46, 6 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Intro now shortened to be a more concise summary as per WP:LEAD. Grimhim (talk) 10:16, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Divinyls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Divinyls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Divinyls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Divinyls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Songwriting collaborations

edit

"During the 1980s and 1990s Amphlett collaborated as a songwriter with other artists including Chrissie Hynde and Cyndi Lauper" Can some details be added of the songs involved ? RGCorris (talk) 20:34, 3 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sure. While I'm not certain of the details of the 'collaboration', Cyndi recorded "Like a Cat" for her A Night to Remember album, and Chrissie covered "Human on the Inside" (re-titled "Human") with her band the Pretenders.Nqr9 (talk) 02:31, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
"Human on the Inside" is credited to Mark McEntee and Shelly Peiken - so if Chrissy Amphlett worked with Chrissie Hynde in a songwriting collaboration, it isn't on that song. RGCorris (talk) 16:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
I'm not aware of any specific collaboration with Chrissie Hynde, but am only a casual fan. If the information is inaccurate, feel free to change it.Nqr9 (talk) 09:35, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply