skip to main content
10.1145/3358695.3361749acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Errors, Biases and Overconfidence in Artificial Emotional Modeling

Published: 14 October 2019 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    With the diffusion and successful new implementation of several machine learning techniques, together with the substantial cost decrease of sensors, also included in mobile devices, the field of emotional analysis and modeling has boosted. Apps, web apps, brain-scanning devices, and Artificial Intelligence assistants often include emotion recognition features or emotional behaviors, but new researches contain, maintain, or create several design errors, which analysis is the main aim of this paper.

    References

    [1]
    Adam, A. 1993. Gendered knowledge - Epistemology and artificial intelligence. AI & Society. (1993).
    [2]
    Axelrod, R. 2004. Robert Axelrod, The Evolution of Cooperation, New York 1984. New York.
    [3]
    Bartneck, C. 2005. A cross-cultural study on attitudes towards robots. Proceedings of the HCI International (2005), 1981–1983.
    [4]
    Bechmann, A. and Lomborg, S. 2013. Why people hate the paperclip. New Media and Society. (2013).
    [5]
    Biondi, G. 2017. A deep learning semantic approach to emotion recognition using the IBM watson bluemix alchemy language. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). 10406 LNCS, (2017), 719–729.
    [6]
    Biondi, G. 2016. Web-based similarity for emotion recognition in web objects. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing - UCC ’16. (2016), 327–332.
    [7]
    Bonarini, A. 2016. Can my robotic home cleaner be happy? Issues about emotional expression in non-bio-inspired robots. Adaptive Behavior. 24, 5 (2016), 335–349.
    [8]
    CAPTAIN, S. 2018. A SMARTER BOT. Fast Company.
    [9]
    Carpenter, J. 2015. Culture and human-robot interaction in militarized spaces: A war story.
    [10]
    Carpenter, J. 2013. The Quiet Professional: An investigation of U.S. military Explosive Ordnance Disposal personnel interactions with everyday field robots. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (2013).
    [11]
    Crivelli, C. 2016. The fear gasping face as a threat display in a Melanesian society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (2016).
    [12]
    Curumsing, M.K. 2019. Understanding the impact of emotions on software: A case study in requirements gathering and evaluation. Journal of Systems and Software. (2019).
    [13]
    Cynthia Lynn, B. 2015. Jibo the first social robot for the home. Jibo. (2015).
    [14]
    Dijkstra, E.W. 1968. Letters to the editor: go to statement considered harmful. Communications of the ACM. 11, 3 (1968), 147–148.
    [15]
    Ferrara, E. 2015. Measuring Emotional Contagion in Social Media. PLOS ONE. 10, 11 (Nov. 2015), e0142390.
    [16]
    Fisk, M.J. The implications of smart home technologies. Inclusive housing in an ageing society. S. Peace and C. Holland, eds. Policy Press.
    [17]
    Franzoni, V. 2017. Emotional affordances in human-machine interactive planning and negotiation. Proceedings - 2017 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, WI 2017 (2017).
    [18]
    Franzoni, V. 2019. Emotional machines: The next revolution. Web Intelligence.
    [19]
    Franzoni, V. 2017. SEMO: A semantic model for emotion recognition in web objects. Proceedings - 2017 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, WI 2017 (2017).
    [20]
    Franzoni, V. and Milani, A. 2019. Emotion Recognition for Self-aid in Addiction Treatment, Psychotherapy, and Nonviolent Communication.
    [21]
    Gervasi, O. 2019. Automating facial emotion recognition. Web Intelligence. (2019).
    [22]
    Howard, A. and Borenstein, J. 2018. The Ugly Truth About Ourselves and Our Robot Creations: The Problem of Bias and Social Inequity. Science and Engineering Ethics. (2018).
    [23]
    Kanai, R. 2011. Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. Current Biology. (2011).
    [24]
    Katsuki, Y. 2015. High-speed Human / Robot Hand Interaction System. (2015).
    [25]
    Kondoh, H. and Futatsugi, K. 2006. To use or not to use the goto statement: Programming styles viewed from Hoare Logic. Science of Computer Programming. 60, 1 (2006), 82–116.
    [26]
    Kramer, A.D.I. 2014. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 111, 24 (Jun. 2014), 8788–90.
    [27]
    Levy, D. 2017. Why not marry a robot? Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (2017).
    [28]
    Lindblom, J. and Ziemke, T. 2003. Social situatedness of natural and artificial intelligence: Vygotsky and beyond. Adaptive Behavior (2003).
    [29]
    Lopatovska, I. 2018. Talk to me: Exploring user interactions with the Amazon Alexa. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.
    [30]
    Lutz, C. 1988. Unnatural emotions : everyday sentiments on a Micronesian Atoll & their challenge to western theory. The University of Chicago Press.
    [31]
    Mirnig, N. 2017. To Err Is Robot: How Humans Assess and Act toward an Erroneous Social Robot. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. (2017).
    [32]
    Morsünbül, Ü. 2018. Attachment and Sex with Robots: An Assessment from Mental Health Perspective. Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar - Current Approaches in Psychiatry. (2018).
    [33]
    Niebuhr, O. and Michalsky, J. 2019. Computer-Generated Speaker Charisma and Its Effects on Human Actions in a Car-Navigation System Experiment - or How Steve Jobs’ Tone of Voice Can Take You Anywhere.
    [34]
    Petrie, H. 2018. Ageism and sexism amongst young computer scientists. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (2018).
    [35]
    Plutchik, R. 1980. Psychoevolutionary Theory of Basic Emotions. American Scientist. February (1980), 2007.
    [36]
    Rau, P.L.P. 2010. A cross-cultural study: Effect of robot appearance and task. International Journal of Social Robotics. (2010).
    [37]
    Riek, L.D. 2009. How anthropomorphism affects empathy toward robots. (2009).
    [38]
    Samani, H. 2013. Cultural robotics: The culture of robotics and robotics in culture. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems. (2013).
    [39]
    SCHIEBINGER, L. and OGAWA, M. 2018. Gendered Innovations in Medicine, Machine Learning, and Robotics医学, 機械学習, ロボット工学分野における「性差研究に基づく技術革新」. TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES. (2018).
    [40]
    Stroessner, S.J. and Benitez, J. 2019. The Social Perception of Humanoid and Non-Humanoid Robots: Effects of Gendered and Machinelike Features. International Journal of Social Robotics. (2019).
    [41]
    Tromholt, M. 2016. The Facebook Experiment: Quitting Facebook Leads to Higher Levels of Well-Being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. (2016).
    [42]
    Vallverdu, J. 2014. Artificial shame models for machines?
    [43]
    Vallverdu, J. Ekman's Paradox and a Naturalistic Strategy to Escape From It. International Journal of Synthetic Emotions. 4, 2, 1–7.
    [44]
    Vallverdú, J. and Trovato, G. 2016. Emotional affordances for human–robot interaction. Adaptive Behavior. 24, 5 (2016).
    [45]
    Whitworth, B. 2005. Polite computing. Behaviour and Information Technology. (2005).
    [46]
    Yip, J.A. 2018. Thanks for Nothing: Expressing Gratitude Invites Exploitation by Competitors.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Advanced techniques for automated emotion recognition in dogs from video data through deep learningNeural Computing and Applications10.1007/s00521-024-10042-3Online publication date: 4-Jul-2024
    • (2023)Harnessing human and machine intelligence for planetary-level climate actionnpj Climate Action10.1038/s44168-023-00056-32:1Online publication date: 17-Aug-2023
    • (2023)From Black Box to Glass Box: Advancing Transparency in Artificial Intelligence Systems for Ethical and Trustworthy AIComputational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops10.1007/978-3-031-37114-1_9(118-130)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WI '19 Companion: IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence - Companion Volume
    October 2019
    326 pages
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 14 October 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. HRI
    2. affective computing
    3. emotion
    4. errors
    5. gendered
    6. overconfidence

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • University of Perugia, Italy

    Conference

    WI '19

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 118 of 178 submissions, 66%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)25
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Advanced techniques for automated emotion recognition in dogs from video data through deep learningNeural Computing and Applications10.1007/s00521-024-10042-3Online publication date: 4-Jul-2024
    • (2023)Harnessing human and machine intelligence for planetary-level climate actionnpj Climate Action10.1038/s44168-023-00056-32:1Online publication date: 17-Aug-2023
    • (2023)From Black Box to Glass Box: Advancing Transparency in Artificial Intelligence Systems for Ethical and Trustworthy AIComputational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops10.1007/978-3-031-37114-1_9(118-130)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2023
    • (2022)A Review on Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics2022 9th International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom)10.23919/INDIACom54597.2022.9763178(365-369)Online publication date: 23-Mar-2022
    • (2022)The unbearable (technical) unreliability of automated facial emotion recognitionBig Data & Society10.1177/205395172211295499:2(205395172211295)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Recognizing and Predicting Neonatal Pain in Preterm Intensive Care Unit: a Study Protocol2022 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT)10.1109/WI-IAT55865.2022.00107(680-682)Online publication date: Nov-2022
    • (2021)Robust Multimodal Emotion Recognition from Conversation with Transformer-Based Crossmodality FusionSensors10.3390/s2114491321:14(4913)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2021
    • (2021)The Recognition of Cross-Cultural Emotional Faces Is Affected by Intensity and Ethnicity in a Japanese SampleBehavioral Sciences10.3390/bs1105005911:5(59)Online publication date: 23-Apr-2021
    • (2021)Emotions of COVID-19: Content Analysis of Self-Reported Information Using Artificial IntelligenceJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/2734123:4(e27341)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2021
    • (2021)Biases in Assigning Emotions in Patients Due to Multicultural IssuesHandbook of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare10.1007/978-3-030-83620-7_9(215-228)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media