Closed
Bug 120410
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Select a profile name and it is not highlighted
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Startup & Profiles, defect, P3)
SeaMonkey
Startup & Profiles
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: nbaca, Assigned: neil)
References
(Depends on 2 open bugs)
Details
(Keywords: regression, testcase, verified1.7)
Attachments
(13 files, 4 obsolete files)
132.87 KB,
image/bmp
|
Details | |
5.71 KB,
application/octet-stream
|
Details | |
3.21 KB,
application/octet-stream
|
Details | |
549 bytes,
patch
|
roc
:
review+
bzbarsky
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
23.89 KB,
image/jpeg
|
Details | |
92.08 KB,
image/jpeg
|
Details | |
1.08 KB,
patch
|
janv
:
review+
mscott
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
2.00 KB,
application/vnd.mozilla.xul+xml
|
Details | |
716 bytes,
application/vnd.mozilla.xul+xml
|
Details | |
88.09 KB,
application/octet-stream
|
Details | |
2.24 KB,
patch
|
janv
:
review+
alecf
:
superreview+
chofmann
:
approval1.7+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
22.58 KB,
image/jpeg
|
Details | |
11.95 KB,
patch
|
janv
:
review+
jag+mozilla
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Trunk build 2002-01-15-03:WinMe Overview: Select a profile from the Profile Manager list and it is not highlighted.This only happens for the profile that was just previously used. Steps to reproduce: 1. Have atleast 2 profiles displayed in Profile Manager 2. Select "profile1" and start the app 3. Exit 4. Double click the *.exe file so that Profile Manager appears again Actual Results: * Notice that no profile is selected, when profile1 should be selected. 5. *Select the first profile (profile1) and it still does not appear highlighted. Start the application and it launches the correct profile. 6. Exit, restart and now select the second profile (profile2) and it is highlighted. 7. *Exit, restart and again no profile is selected, when profile2 should be selected. 8. *Try selecting profile2 and it is not highlighted 9. Try selecting profile1 and it Now appears highlighted Actual Results Summary: It appears that the previously used profile is the one that does not display a highlight when selected in the profile manager list. Expected Results: Selecting a profile name in the Profile Manager List should highlight the selection in all cases. Including the last/previously used profile.
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
bug 120063?
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 120063 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
from my dupe, also try my testcase, as I have several profiles, one from each build. This is a regression started with build 1-14-03 w2k, It works in 1-11-03 build, I see that trying to select one the last listed profile, the profile picker selection bar is not visable, but you can start mozilla in that profile. My testcase there is not the same as it is here, but I can reproduce this crazy problem.
Keywords: regression
Comment 5•23 years ago
|
||
its also an issue in 1-17-03 w2k build.
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
This only happens to me when my last used profile is the last profile displayed in the profile manager. If my last used profile is not in the last row, everything worked fine. I used 2002011803 trunk build on WinNT.
Comment 7•23 years ago
|
||
weird part is today, I decided to do manage profiles > 'delete' and deleted all the profiles (I had probably 12 or so) except 2 I made with ns6.2 and one I created with today's build 1-18-03 (w2k) and one I made with 1-17-03 build.. now I dont see this problem.. so I must have a been a problem with either profile picker itself when the RDF:li blocker problem hit about 1-14-02, or when a profile was created it created a problematic line in the profile picker itself and we say this..was crazy and strange. So after doing those steps above in this writing I almost certain I cannot reproduce the problem anymore. so wfm 1-18-03 w2k.
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•23 years ago
|
||
Grace, how many profiles existed before you also saw this problem?
Comment 9•23 years ago
|
||
I got the behavior back by doing this: Like I said I create 1 profile with each build & its shortcut in a directory.. so what I did is: 1) created 4 new profiles with builds 1-14 call it 1-14, repeated with builds 1-8, 1-10,1-11.. 2) open 1-14 build and use manage profile > delete the last added profile.. 3) close profile manager 4) open it again using the 1-14 build, last line has the visual problem.. 5) close profile manager open say build 1-19 and it still has the problem with last line and steps to reproduce using test case will work again. Then follow my next comment and using 1-18 or 1-19 build delete what is left from the 4 you added, 1-8, 1-10, 1-11, 1-14 profiles.. you then cannot reproduce the original problem, and it is gone again.
Comment 10•23 years ago
|
||
after doing those in previous comments, today I used build 1-22-03 to create a new profile: named "2002-1-22", which I had used in build 1-14: "2002-1-14" I had 7 profiles in my list before I created this 8th one.. I got this original problem after the profile was created. I then was unable to follow any testcase using build 1-22, (didn't try the testcase for builds 1-14 like in comment #9) or was unable to reproduce using similar steps in comment #9. but I was able to get an invalid selection by just creating a new profile with build 1-22 again, named "2002-1-22", but not by typing "default user" as the profile name.
Comment 11•23 years ago
|
||
ok, I see this again with build 1-23-04 w2k, I have 7 previous profiles, so 7 seems like the magical one.. I then added an 8th profile with this build and I can reproduce the testcase in the dupe of bug 120063 comment #2 of changing profiles now, but I didn't delete any profiles as in comment #9 here. So this exists for sure, its weird.
Comment 12•23 years ago
|
||
I tried this one more time, I deleted all my profiles except 2 netscape profiles and one I created with build 1-19.. then proceeded to add a new profile, one for each new build again.. before today I had a total of 6 profiles, then when adding a profile with build 2-1 I seen this problem on the seventh profile. So their is either a magic 7 number here, or its related to the combination of the profiles there, is there a chance this is a possible corruption in the registry.dat file?
Comment 13•23 years ago
|
||
with only seven profiles I cannot reproduce the testcase, but on first load I see this #7 profile is not highlighted, but doesn't happen after subsequent uses of the profiles.. if I add an 8th one maybe I will be able to reproduce a testcase.
Comment 14•23 years ago
|
||
I created a new profile using build 2-2-08, it is the 8th profile in my list, it now has the problem.. I think I can reproduce the testcase again. Any thoughts?
Comment 15•23 years ago
|
||
I think I can rule out corrupt registry.dat file, unless the current Profile Manager code is creating a corrupt one itself. I deleted all my profiles and started from scratch to see if that was the case, I created a new one using netscape 6.2.1, and seven new profiles with mixed numbers, dashes, & text, and still found a problem with #8 not being highlighted. So some code was changed in the profile manager way back on the 13th, or 14th for the worse..about when the RDF:li problem hit.
Updated•23 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: -- → P3
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.2
Comment 16•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 124779 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18•23 years ago
|
||
Setting as a blocker of bug 123929, safeguard against profile corruption tracking bug. How big is your registry.dat file right now? Have you ever deleted it manually?
Blocks: profile-corrupt
Comment 19•23 years ago
|
||
Andrew, currently its 116K, I did delete it somewhere around comment #15 is where I did delete all the profiles/folders and the registry.dat file. I still have a problem with this.
Comment 20•23 years ago
|
||
FWIW, this doesn't appear to stem from the localstore.rdf corruption problem, but take note of bug 90337 comment #58.. and its reference to localstore.rdf corruption, and then the bug 120049 with RDF:li problem where this started. there are several RDF related bugs in bonsai for this time frame: 01/13/2002 00:00 and 01/14/2002 23:59 http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=SeaMonkeyAll&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=&file=&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=explicit&mindate=01%2F13%2F02&maxdate=01%2F14%2F02+23%3A59&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot bug 113894: RDF persistence breaks when there is a / in the file path. blob literal support: bug 115926. Bug 118865, bug 33197. Support serialization of integer and date literals; support `parseType="Resource"' This may very well be unrelated, but didn't see anything with build 1-14 timeframe other than this that could be causing this problem.
Comment 21•23 years ago
|
||
In the meaning of "the most recently used profile will not be highlighted", I'm seeing this on MacOS9 (Japanese). Is the bug 120410 another dup of this ?
Comment 22•23 years ago
|
||
Sorry. I mean bug 120598.
Comment 23•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 120598 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 24•23 years ago
|
||
yea, same exact problem, but adding that this possible xp toolkit/widget tree issue, size of outliner window, see dupe for more, also going to say there was a bug to change to outliner on same bonsai query above.
Comment 25•23 years ago
|
||
Its possible, if its trees related & scrollbar issues with a view, Jan may be able to help figure this out. so cc'ing Jan on outliner help.
Comment 26•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 120598 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 27•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 128636 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 28•23 years ago
|
||
renominating for nsbeta1. I think syd thinks this should be fixed, and I partially agree (i.e., it is effectively unusable in this state, but, yes, you have to have ~7 profiles created before you encounter this bug).
Comment 29•23 years ago
|
||
nsbeta1- per Nav triage team. So many bugs, so little time; this one is *way* down the list...
Comment 30•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 122635 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 31•23 years ago
|
||
this is *almost* fixed, so now in build 2002-4-10-03 w2k.. thru bug 135048 also see bug 134889. The only issue is on creation of the 7th profile, you can click on it, but it doesn't highlight. this is only on *creation of it*.. any use afterward of any profile combinations, this works without a problem.
Comment 32•23 years ago
|
||
so this works if you after create the 7th profile, and exit mozilla, then restart it you can click on it, and the it will highlight. So Jan, Good work on the outliner fix! It looks like there needs to be some sort of initialization that needs to be called as if you just started mozilla from scratch. It appears that after creation of a profile, when it updates the view-box (outliner) there.. it doesn't appear to be executing a refresh/reset/init or what ever to update the view there like it does upon a fresh mozilla start. so I bet that is what is left to fix this problem.
Comment 33•23 years ago
|
||
I wanna make note before I get too far ahead of myself, is that my testcase in my dupe is *still valid* for the '8th' profile, I cant get it to highlight at all unless I use another profile first, then it will. So It looks like there is more work to be done here.
Comment 34•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 147049 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 35•22 years ago
|
||
As a kind of confirmation of comment #33: with 10 profiles (Netscape and Mozilla ones) and also with 11 ones it does not work: Most recently used profile will never look highlighted...
Comment 36•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 151858 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 37•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 168250 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 38•22 years ago
|
||
I doubt that 7 is always a magic number. As I noted in bug #168250, I'm seeing this problem with fewer than 7 profiles.
Comment 39•22 years ago
|
||
I have this problem with 5 profiles.
Comment 40•22 years ago
|
||
I think the reason why more dupes are coming in is because the magic number is now 5 or 6 rather than 7. This has changed because of the addition of the extra tick box on the profile chooser box making the selection window smaller. Dupes have been on Mac as well as PC so changing Hardware/OS-> All Taking out target milestone seeing it's already gone past that, needs to be re-targetted.
OS: Windows ME → All
Hardware: PC → All
Target Milestone: mozilla1.2alpha → ---
Comment 41•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 192532 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 42•22 years ago
|
||
I think the magic number is one. I can't get my only profile highlighted. I have three 4.x profiles and one Mozilla profile. The 4.x profile names I can highlight, but not Mozilla's. If it weren't for the fact that on installing each new build the profile manager is automatically started, I wouldn't know Mozilla thought there was more than one profile, since that's the only time I ever see the profile manager. My profiles are in \MOZILLA\PROFILES and \NETSCAPE\Users.
Comment 43•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 192745 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 44•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 193344 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 45•22 years ago
|
||
Selection of an previously used item can't be displayed only (see ). And if one uses mozilla more offen than the others, then only one item seems to be wrong displayed.
Comment 46•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 193484 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 47•22 years ago
|
||
Re Comment #42 In your case the magic number is 4. The Netscape 4 profiles count.
Comment 48•22 years ago
|
||
When it's going to be fixed? The bug is still present in 2003022814 build, but version 1.3 is being released !!!
Comment 49•22 years ago
|
||
The problem here is one of corruption, particularly of registry.dat, which may go by different names. The problem does not occur when profiles are added. The problem only occurs after at least one profile is deleted, and then others added. Look at the registry.dat on a computer where Mozilla is exhibiting this problem. I think you will see several mentions of old, deleted profiles. Once a profile is deleted, all mention of it should be removed from registry.dat. Currently, it is not. If we remove all extra data from registry.dat, this problem will go away. That is because then the registry.dat will be identical to a registry.dat that never experienced any profile deletions. That makes this look a lot like bug 113203, which has to do with data loss after renaming profiles.
Flags: blocking1.4a?
Keywords: testcase
Comment 50•22 years ago
|
||
renominating
Comment 51•22 years ago
|
||
Nav triage team: nsbeta1+/adt3
Updated•22 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.4beta
Comment 52•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 197780 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 53•22 years ago
|
||
I have seen this bug in two separate installations Mozilla 1.3, both running in Windows 2000. In both installations, I used the control panel to remove the previous mozilla installation, and then installed a complete mozilla 1.3 final. These installations have about four and five profiles. Adding a new profile does not change the behaviour. This was not observed in the mozilla nightly build from 2003-01-21. (sorry, build number not readily available). Suggest nomination for Mozilla 1.4a.
Updated•22 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.4a? → blocking1.4a-
Comment 54•22 years ago
|
||
Nav triage team: nsbeta1-
Comment 55•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 199475 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 56•22 years ago
|
||
I experienced this problem after my installation of Mozilla 1.3 on windows 2000pro. 1. I did not uninstall Mozilla 1.2 before installing Mozilla 1.3. 2. I have 6 profiles. 3. When I started up Mozilla 1.3 after the installation was complete the profile manager would not highlight the profile I had last used the last time I used Mozilla 1.2 before the installation of 1.3. I could highlight all of the 5 other profile names. 4. Mozilla 1.3 started up just fine with the (unhighlighted) profile after I clicked on it. 5. This was fixed after I rebooted and started Mozilla 1.3 again.
Comment 57•22 years ago
|
||
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030401] I also have this bug: *I have only one Mozilla profile, which I allways use; The others profiles are Netscape v4 unmigrated profiles. *The Moz profile (created, not migrated) is allways the last one, except for bug 193753. *I think this bug has been present for quite some releases !?
Comment 58•22 years ago
|
||
This picture is taken after "selecting" (= clicking on") the Mozilla profile. NB: Going from 24b to 256c reduced the .BMP size from 396KB to 133KB.
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #119744 -
Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → image/bmp
Comment 59•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 201384 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 60•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 202212 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 61•22 years ago
|
||
Does this really belong with jag?
Comment 62•22 years ago
|
||
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507] Bug still there. (with v1.3 profile, at least) Addition to my comment 57: I created a 2nd Moz profile, and found that this bug happens in 2 cases: *always, the last/previous profile used *immediately after creation, the newly created profile too.
Comment 63•22 years ago
|
||
I assume that there might be something messed up in the registry.dat file. Could somebody please post theirs? While this may seem to disagree with comment 15, it does not. My guess is that something in our code does something bad and that is likely to be reflected in the registry.dat file. I don't think the registry.dat file became corrupt due to external influences, such as from a write that was incomplete due to a system crash. Based on comment 4, this looks like a regression that began with the 20020114 builds. Although that comment says "03" for the year, that comment was posted in the year 2002. Could some intrepid soul track down which check-in caused it?
Comment 64•22 years ago
|
||
This file was manually deleted before v1.3 install, and left alone for v1.4a and v1.4b.
Comment 65•21 years ago
|
||
Re comment 62: I said "immediately after creation, the newly created profile too.". Well, right now, this is not 100% true. I think it happened like this tonight: 1. created a profile in v1.4b: no highlight :-( 2. deleted it 3. created a profile in v1.3.1: highlighted :-) 4. deleted it 5. created a profile in v1.4b (to check): highlighted :-) An unexpected case of auto-repair !? NB: When I say highlight in this comment, it's light gray, not dark blue :-(
Updated•21 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.4?
Updated•21 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.4? → blocking1.4-
Comment 66•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 209385 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 67•21 years ago
|
||
This is my recreation scenario with 1.4 nightly build 20030615 on OS/2. Started with a fresh build an no profiles: 1) Start mozilla and click "Manage Profiles..." when convert profile dialog comes up. 2) Create 5 new profiles ("test1", "test2",...,"test5"). 3) Start mozilla from profile "test5" 4) Close and restart mozilla When the Profile Manager appears, you should notice that "test5" is not highlighted. If you attempt the same steps with "test4", it will also not be highlighted when the Profile Manager comes up. However, this does not happen for the first three profiles; they are all properly highlighted.
Comment 68•21 years ago
|
||
Enabled Javascript dump() and strict warnings, and I get this error when my profile doesn't highlight: JavaScript strict warning: chrome://global/content/bindings/listbox.xml#listbox.addItemToSelection() line 5: reference to undefined property item.selected
Comment 69•21 years ago
|
||
OK, put some dump statements in profileSelection.js, in the functions AddItem() (which adds the profile names to the profile listbox) and highlightCurrentProfile(). In highlightCurrentProfile(), I looped over profileList's childNodes and dumped some info on each one. Here is what I get: === AddItem() - listitem = [object XULElement @ 0x9e3790] - listitem.label = pedemont - listitem.id = profileName_pedemont === AddItem() - listitem = [object XULElement @ 0x9e3bb8] - listitem.label = test1 - listitem.id = profileName_test1 === AddItem() - listitem = [object XULElement @ 0x9e3f00] - listitem.label = test2 - listitem.id = profileName_test2 === AddItem() - listitem = [object XULElement @ 0x9f11a8] - listitem.label = test3 - listitem.id = profileName_test3 === AddItem() - listitem = [object XULElement @ 0x9f13d8] - listitem.label = test4 - listitem.id = profileName_test4 === AddItem() - listitem = [object XULElement @ 0x9f1480] - listitem.label = test5 - listitem.id = profileName_test5 ==> highlightCurrentProfile() getting item [profileName_test4] by id ====== These are the labels of the profileList's childNodes: item=[object XULElement @ 0x988f70] id= label=undefined item=[object XULElement @ 0x9e3790] id=profileName_pedemont label=pedemont item=[object XULElement @ 0x9e3bb8] id=profileName_test1 label=test1 item=[object XULElement @ 0x9e3f00] id=profileName_test2 label=test2 item=[object XULElement @ 0x9f11a8] id=profileName_test3 label=test3 item=[object XULElement @ 0x9f13d8] id=profileName_test4 label=undefined item=[object XULElement @ 0x9f1480] id=profileName_test5 label=undefined ====== ----- currentProfileItem = [object XULElement @ 0x9f13d8] currentProfileItem.label = undefined ==> selectItem( [object XULElement @ 0x9f13d8] undefined ) <== selectItem() <== highlightCurrentProfile() So for some unknown reason, the label values of 'test4' and 'test5' profiles are getting corrupted somehow.
Comment 70•21 years ago
|
||
OK, added another dump in the AddItem() function: I put a QueryInterface right after the appendChild call: kids.appendChild(listitem); + try { + dump( " [] listitem.QI = " + listitem.QueryInterface(Components.interfaces.nsIDOMXULSelectControlItemElement) + "\n" ); + } catch(e) { + dump( " [] listitem.QI failed !!! \n" ); + } And here is the output I got: === AddItem() listitem= [object XULElement @ 0xa077c8] id = profileName_pedemont label= pedemont [] listitem.QI = [object XULElement @ 0xa077c8] === AddItem() listitem= [object XULElement @ 0xa07c28] id = profileName_test1 label= test1 [] listitem.QI = [object XULElement @ 0xa07c28] === AddItem() listitem= [object XULElement @ 0xa07fa8] id = profileName_test2 label= test2 [] listitem.QI = [object XULElement @ 0xa07fa8] === AddItem() listitem= [object XULElement @ 0xa29288] id = profileName_test3 label= test3 [] listitem.QI = [object XULElement @ 0xa29288] === AddItem() listitem= [object XULElement @ 0xa29480] id = profileName_test4 label= test4 [] listitem.QI failed !!! === AddItem() listitem= [object XULElement @ 0xa29560] id = profileName_test5 label= test5 [] listitem.QI failed !!! I have been told that this is probably because the XBL binding is failing on the last two profiles. Anyone know XBL innards?
Comment 71•21 years ago
|
||
Bryner: can you take a look at this? Check out the last comment.
Comment 72•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 211198 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 73•21 years ago
|
||
Comment 74•21 years ago
|
||
Couple of notes: 1. This was happening before the profile manager started using listboxes so will be something common to both listboxes and trees 2. If you use a buildID 2002011103 or prior then the profile shows up as selected correctly so even if the registry.dat is corrupted mozilla used to handle it better.
Comment 75•21 years ago
|
||
I'm seeing this on FireBird 20030727 for Linux, and on 0.6.
Comment 76•21 years ago
|
||
weird. i never noticed this until the recent firebird 0.6.1rc builds. i got it to happen some of the time with the firebird 0.6 milestone, and most of the time with the 0.6.1rc builds all on windows 2000. usually the first few profiles would work, but profiles farther down the list wouldn't be highlighted. interestingly, i have a custom theme that i replace classic.jar with. it loads up front, and skins the profile manager. and i never get the non-highlighted thing with it. no matter which profile was last used, or how many profiles there are. so this might be semi-theme related. i'm trying sift thru the css and find out what might cause it.
Comment 77•21 years ago
|
||
The problem is still present in resent builds with file in attachment http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=126810&action=view. The last item cann't be highlighted, after it has been selected last time.
Comment 78•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 217589 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 79•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 219732 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 80•21 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6a) Gecko/20031030 Interesting: I recently upgraded from Win2K to WinXP (fresh install, actually, not an upgrade. I blew away the entire Mozilla install directory), and kept my profile directory in tact. I did have to re-add all of the profiles (i.e. mainly just to point Mozilla to the proper directory locations of the pre-existing profiles), and now the highlighting works properly. Could this be a case where there is some corrupt information stored in the Mozilla configuration registry? Since the profile directories themselves weren't modified in any way, it would have to be something outside that space.
Comment 81•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 231672 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 82•21 years ago
|
||
Unsetting missed milestone target.
Flags: blocking1.7a?
Target Milestone: mozilla1.4beta → ---
Comment 83•21 years ago
|
||
Probably not going to hold the release for this since it's really a visual glitch and not a loss of functionality. Neil, can you help us with this?
Flags: blocking1.7a? → blocking1.7a-
Assignee | ||
Comment 84•21 years ago
|
||
Sorry, it's not sufficiently reproducible for me to help. If I see it happen, then I'll try to remember to look into it.
Comment 85•21 years ago
|
||
Neil, I have it fully reproducable, so just grab me when you see me on #mozilla and I'll get you any information you need that I can get.
Assignee | ||
Comment 86•21 years ago
|
||
OK, with some help from Ian, the problem only occurs if the current profile is not on the first screenful of profiles.
Assignee | ||
Comment 87•21 years ago
|
||
I'm seeing a recursive call to the non-reentrant EnsureIndexIsVisible :-(
Assignee | ||
Comment 88•21 years ago
|
||
OK, so this fixes it by removing the reentrancy - I also tried removing profiles one by one until the scrollbar disappears and indeed once it does so row 0 becomes visible even without that code.
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Assignee: jag → neil.parkwaycc.co.uk
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 89•21 years ago
|
||
Whoops, wrong patch :-[
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #141058 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #141060 -
Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Attachment #141060 -
Flags: review?(roc)
Comment 90•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 141058 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch add a comment why you commented out that piece of code. Bug number should be sufficient :) let's hope it's not going to break anything r=varga
Attachment #141058 -
Flags: review+
Comment 91•21 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #86) > OK, with some help from Ian, the problem only occurs if the current profile is > not on the first screenful of profiles. not quite. i'm still getting it with firebird builds from 0.6.1 to recent. it can happen to the last profile on a list of 4, which are all visible - no scrollbar. it also occurs on any additional profiles after the 4th. it does not happen to profiles 1-3. contrary to my previous experience with this bug (comment #76), this sounds a little more in line with other comments. if you ask me, the circumstances which cause it are still a bit unpredictable (i.e. the "magic number"). so i'm not sure if this patch will truly fix it (comment #49, comment #63, comment #69, comment #74) not sure if it means anything, but lately i always get this js error in the 0.6.1 build: Error: uncaught exception: [Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x8000ffff (NS_ERROR_UNEXPECTED) [nsIPrefBranch.getBoolPref]" nsresult: "0x8000ffff (NS_ERROR_UNEXPECTED)" location: "JS frame :: chrome://communicator/content/profile/profileSelection.js :: StartUp :: line 97" data: no] no errors in the other builds on windows 2000.
Comment 92•21 years ago
|
||
I applied patch 141060 to my debug tree and recompiled /layout. I then deleted compreg.dat and chrome.rdf/overlayinfo. I started |mozilla -p| to bring up the profile selection: still no selection in the listbox! :( Furthermore, it's getting worse: with this patch applied, the first entry of listbox is plain white (even though mouse-selecting it shows brings up its name). The formerly invisibly selected profile entry does now get a focus frame border, but no focus bakground - and I can't start that profile anymore. :( I don't think that the scrollbar behaviour is relevant in this bug - I have only four profiles and can see the bug nonetheless: - start with |mozilla -p "kddev"| - shutdown mozilla - start with |mozilla -p| - "kddev" is invisibly selected (as one finds out by keyboard-moving the selection), but usable. After some hacking I found out that the "manifestation line" of this bug is profileList.selectItem( currentProfileItem ); in highlightCurrentProfile() in http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/profile/resources/content/profileSelection.js#118 |selectItem| is a method of the "listbox" binding in listbox.xml and in turn calls another method named |addItemToSelection|. This function tries to execute item.selected = true; on the listitem to be selected - and fails. The "listitem" binding has *not* yet been attached to the listitem and hence the setter for property |selected| in http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/xpfe/global/resources/content/bindings/listbox.xml#759 can't be executed...
Assignee | ||
Comment 93•21 years ago
|
||
If you can reproduce this with the Switch Profile dialog (those of you that have it), can you open the DOM Inspector, open the Switch Profile dialog, inspect the broken item, look in Computed Style and XBL Bindings and see that the binding isn't actually there? In Ian's case, DOM Inspector said that the binding was there, but because of the reentrancy bug it hadn't actually been attached correctly.
Comment 94•21 years ago
|
||
DOMI says (in XBL and Computed Style) that the listitem has the binding "listitem-iconic" (and that's extending the binding "listitem"). DOMI shows the |selected| property's getter and setter. DOMI also shows an object member |selected| attached to the listitem object that seems to shadow the binding's |selected| property. After evaluating the JS commands |delete target.selected| and |target.selected=true|, the listitem is correctly highlighted. (I remember having had a very similar problem during 1.3 or something, but don't ask me for details. :( )
Assignee | ||
Comment 95•21 years ago
|
||
That version of the problem sounds suspiciously similar to bug 90337, which ere claims to have fixed...
Comment 96•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 119744 [details]
Screen Capture of non-highlighted profile
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113] (W98SE)
(for the record)
Now (v1.6), the Mozilla profile appears at the top/before of the NetscapeV4
ones...
![]() |
||
Comment 97•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 141060 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch [Checked in: Comment 100] sr=bzbarsky if this is really no longer needed.
Attachment #141060 -
Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky) → superreview+
Comment on attachment 141060 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch [Checked in: Comment 100] Yeah, the nsGfxScrollFrame should scroll us up to the top if it removes the vertical scrollbar.
Attachment #141060 -
Flags: review?(roc) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 99•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 141060 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch [Checked in: Comment 100] Asa, if you still want this...
Attachment #141060 -
Flags: approval1.7a?
Assignee | ||
Comment 100•21 years ago
|
||
Fix checked in.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #141060 -
Attachment description: Proposed patch → Proposed patch
[Checked in: Comment 100]
Comment 101•21 years ago
|
||
Neil: I'm not sure why this bug is marked fixed. As far as I can see the patch does not seem to have improved the problem described by this bug. And maybe even introduced another problem (the empty line, see comment #92, I also saw it once in profile manager, and always in "switch profile").
Comment 102•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 141060 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch [Checked in: Comment 100] didn't make the alpha train.
Attachment #141060 -
Flags: approval1.7a?
Comment 103•21 years ago
|
||
Reopening as bug is not fixed, screenshots to follow.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 104•21 years ago
|
||
This is from BuildID 2004022315 (though downloaded 2004022410) running on WinXP SP1
Comment 105•21 years ago
|
||
Screenshot containing 4 Select User Profile dialog boxes A through to D A, B and C show the list of users, Default User is the one that should be highlighted. Dialog A is how it first opens, B is when you scroll to the top, C is when you scroll to the bottom (not sure if the blank at the bottom is significant). Dialog D comes from selecting Tools, Switch Profile - note how the top user "evansp" is completely missing.
Assignee | ||
Comment 106•21 years ago
|
||
Interesting... the previous bug was caused by the scroll bar, this version is caused by the lack of the scroll bar...
Status: REOPENED → ASSIGNED
Comment 107•21 years ago
|
||
Neil, this checkin broke the filter and search dialogs in mail. See Bug #235451 for more details...Thanks!
Assignee | ||
Comment 108•21 years ago
|
||
Perhaps the list used the scrollbar event to construct the list item frames?
Blocks: 235451
Comment 109•21 years ago
|
||
uhh... i don't think we're all on the same page here. (In reply to comment #106) > Interesting... the previous bug was caused by the scroll bar, this version is > caused by the lack of the scroll bar... the original issue as reported (last used profile appears unhighlighted on next run) is NOT affected by the scroll bar/lack thereof. i've seen this bug on ~0.6 firebird builds all the way up to post-0.8 firefox nightlies. i get it regardless of whether there's a scrollbar. with recent firefox nightlies i also see the NEW issue reported in comment #105, and that is almost certainly something different, which probably needs its own bug. for me, it occurs with the launch-time profile manager (no switcher in the fox) WITH a scrollbar. - i have five profiles in the list. the list can show ~4.8 items at once. - the last-used profile is at the bottom causing the list to be scrolled down from the start. - the item at the top of the visible list (second actual item) is not drawn, and cannot be directly selected by clicking. - however, selecting a profile below it, and arrowing up causes it to be drawn and selected. - clicking the up scrollbar button causes it to be drawn, but does not scroll the list. - clicking a second time scrolls the list. - scrolling with the thumb, clicking in the bar above the thumb, the mousewheel, and the Page Up key cause the items to be drawn and the list to scroll up. for some reason, it doesn't occur when a profile higher up on the list is last-used, even if the list is scrolled to the bottom from the start. > (not sure if the blank at the bottom is significant) as for the "blank at the bottom" - that is just a theme issue - the listbox's fixed size doesn't allow x items evenly. notice the longer list in the switch dialog due to the lack of the "Work Offline" checkbox. you might see the same thing in the theme/extension lists. probably not a factor. hmm. and now i seem to have lost a profile. probably from running firebird and firefox at the same time. but that is neither here or there.
Assignee | ||
Comment 110•21 years ago
|
||
OK, so it looks like the ian's missing row issue and mscott's missing row issue are completely separate problems. ian's problem is that the list wasn't properly scrolling when its size changed. mscott's problem is that before a list's size is known it doesn't know how to scroll properly; this problem was hidden before because the listbox blindly scrolled to the top anyway, which is what hurt the profile manager in the first place.
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #142231 -
Flags: superreview?(mscott)
Attachment #142231 -
Flags: review?(varga)
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #142231 -
Flags: review?(varga) → review+
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #142231 -
Flags: superreview?(mscott) → superreview+
Comment 111•21 years ago
|
||
The new problem has gone away with the supplemental patch, but the original problem is still there.
Comment 112•21 years ago
|
||
Okay, been digging a bit further. 1. On a system which has 5 Netscape 4.x profiles and no mozilla profiles setup (deleted mozilla folder in c:\documents and settings\administrator\application data) 2. Start Mozilla buildID 2004030108 3. No profile highlighted though you can highlight any of them (probably another bug) 4. Select top profile in list to convert 5. Check highlights via tools, switch profile 6. Restart mozilla using -profilemanager switch 7. Correct profile is highlighted Alternatively: Steps 1-3 as above 4. Select bottom (5th profile) in list to convert 5. Highlight doesn't work if you try via tools, switch profile 6. Restart mozilla using -profilemanager switch 7. Profile does not highlight.
Comment 113•21 years ago
|
||
Attaching a testcase. Open it using -chrome file:///path/profile.xul. The profile 'testuser' should be selected, but isn't. If you manually select another profile, it's ok. But after that, if you select testuser again, it has a focus ring, but no background color.
Comment 114•21 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #113) > Created an attachment (id=142753) > testcase WFM? 'testuser' is preselected for me in firebird 0.6.1 with a custom theme, and in firefox 20040229 default theme. with lists and trees there are 2 possible states: selected and current. 'selected' is when it is shaded or highlighted; and sometimes more than one item can be selected at once (bookmarks manager). 'current' gives the border (focus ring) to the last item clicked. for me, 'testuser' is preselected, but not current - highlighted, but no border. clicking on other items will select/current them, but then 'testuser' stays selected as well. selecting another item then arrowing towards 'testuser' causes weird things. from above, it hits 'testuser' then jumps back to the top. from the bottom, it hits 'testuser' and stops. everytime i click on an item i get a couple of these js errors: Error: [Exception... "'Permission denied to get property UnnamedClass.classes' when calling method: [nsIAccessibleProvider::accessible]" nsresult: "0x8057001e (NS_ERROR_XPC_JS_THREW_STRING)" location: "<unknown>" data: no]
Comment 115•21 years ago
|
||
Did you open it using -chrome file:///path/profile.xul ? If i just open it in the browser, it indeed works. If i use it as chrome (like the real profile manager is), it doesn't work. To update the testcase to what the current code is, change this: - currentProfileItem.selected = true; + profileList.selectItem( currentProfileItem ); + profileList.ensureElementIsVisible( currentProfileItem );
Comment 116•21 years ago
|
||
indeed, it isn't highlighted. apologies for my previous comment - i wasn't aware there was a difference between -chrome and just opening it. the arrowing weirdness is the same. and with my custom theme i can directly click on 'testuser' and get a focus ring, but no highlight. in my theme i define separate selected and current states. in the default theme there is only a selected state and a combined selected+current state. i should also clarify - the item *is* actually selected (in the profile manager, you can hit enter, and that profile will load), it only *appears* not selected. inspect the test case in DOMI, and you'll see all the listitems have the same dom nodes - 'testuser' does not have selected="true". the javascript object correctly shows selected="true".
Assignee | ||
Comment 117•21 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #115) >+ profileList.selectItem( currentProfileItem ); >+ profileList.ensureElementIsVisible( currentProfileItem ); These lines, also available at lines 47 and 48 or profileManager.js, trigger the latest reproducible issue. For some reason the selectItem call is happening after the xbl is bound to the listitem (that has already been added to the document) but if you switch those two lines then everything is hunky-dory. Now I know that if you have an object with a frame then it will get an XBL binding; if it's never had a JS wrapper then one will be created when it's first accessed, but this appears to be a loophole - the element is added to the document but doesn't get an XBL binding because it has no frame.
Assignee | ||
Comment 118•21 years ago
|
||
This testcase will run in the browser. All the buttons in the second row should be disabled.
![]() |
||
Comment 119•21 years ago
|
||
What fun. Here's what's going on: 1) You create an element. It has no document, so the wrapper we create for it doesn't load the XBL binding (fogetting for now that it makes no sense to apply an XBL binding to a node that's not in a document...) 2) You insert the node into the document as a child of a display:none element. That means we never even try to construct a frame for it, so the binding is not attached. 3) You try to set a property that's implemented by the binding. No binding, so this just sets the property on the JSObject, not the attribute on the DOM node. and then it's all downhill from there. Now I would think that we _would_ load the binding in step 2. That should probably be done by nsContentUtils::ReparentContentWrapper. But of course this is a XUL element, and XUL elements don't even get their content wrappers reparented (see bug 235640). So that probably needs to be fixed first, followed by fixing ReparentContentWrapper. Alternately, we need a better solution to force loading of bindings for a node... The current hacks to make bindings attach to nodes that are not in documents, the hack when creating a content wrapper, etc, are pretty uncalled for.
Depends on: 235640
Comment 120•21 years ago
|
||
I've tried switching lines 47 and 48 round in profileManager.js and it does not provide a workaround, the same behaviour as before is exhibited.
Comment 121•21 years ago
|
||
I also did switches on lines 197 and 198 in profileManager.js and 118 and 119 in profileSelection.js and this didn't fix my startup problem detailed in commment#112
Assignee | ||
Comment 122•21 years ago
|
||
Strange, because when I made these switches the problem went away...
![]() |
||
Comment 123•21 years ago
|
||
We should probably file a separate bug on loading bindings when we reparent content wrappers (per comment 119). This one has far too much noise to be used for that, and may end up with a fix in the JS anyway.
Comment 124•21 years ago
|
||
I've added the extra change: - var profile = new Profile( aProfName, aProfDir, "yes" ); + var profile = new Profile( aProfName, "yes" ); and it still has made no difference. I start with 5 non-migrated NS 4.x profiles and select the 5th one in the list, when I restart mozilla with the -profilemanager command the 5th profile is selected but not highlighted.
Comment 125•21 years ago
|
||
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, we recently discovered the same error in Mozilla as is described in this bug. Operating System: Windows 2000 Mozilla 1.6 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 Mozilla is used with different profiles for different email accounts. Initially, when profile A is selected, the profile is highlighted in the profile manager as it should be. Then, after exiting and restarting mozilla, profile A isn’t highlighted but can be correctly started. The other profiles are highlighted correctly. Then, when one starts mozilla with profile B, after exiting and restarting, profile B isn’t highlighted any more (but can still be started), and profile A is correctly highlighted again. So, this indeed seems to be the same bug as mentioned in this bug report. Our question regarding this bug is, is this already fixed or will it be fixed in the near future? Or is there a workaround for this bug? For answers to this or any additional questions, please respond to the email address mentioned below. Yours sincerely Weiß Software & Systeme GmbH Sven Schuster Email address: sven.schuster@weiss-software.de
Comment 126•21 years ago
|
||
Still having the issue on w2k build 2004041310 (1.7b) Only happens on the last Mozilla (native) profile which is above my other NS4.7x profiles I have 4 different profiles of each type (native and NS4.7 - these raenot used any more actually) I have this behavior since 1.1, I believe. I used to suspect a buggy Matrox video driver, but I switched to a recent ati and still have the same issue.
Comment 127•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 241706 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Assignee | ||
Comment 128•20 years ago
|
||
Ok, so I was able to reproduce the issue even with attachment 143022 [details] [diff] [review]; hopefully moving the selection logic into AddItem will kill this one once and for all.
Attachment #143022 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 129•20 years ago
|
||
Bad news I'm afraid, tested with patch applied and steps from comment 124 still cause the bug to show :-(
Comment 130•20 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 131•20 years ago
|
||
Selecting the current profile after a timeout does appear to be more reliable. I haven't been able to figure out why yet, but the profile isn't quite scrolled into view, so as a double hack I set a second timeout to ensure it's visible.
Attachment #148509 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 132•20 years ago
|
||
Latest patch does seem to fix the problem.
Assignee | ||
Comment 133•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 149308 [details] [diff] [review] Possible branch band-aid This is only intended to be a bit of branch band-aid so that the problem does not appear. For the trunk I have decided to convert the list into a tree instead.
Attachment #149308 -
Attachment description: Lame hack → Possible branch band-aid
Attachment #149308 -
Flags: superreview?(alecf)
Attachment #149308 -
Flags: review?(varga)
Comment 134•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 149308 [details] [diff] [review] Possible branch band-aid heh yeah that's a band-aid all right :) sr=alecf
Attachment #149308 -
Flags: superreview?(alecf) → superreview+
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #149308 -
Flags: review?(varga) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 135•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 149308 [details] [diff] [review] Possible branch band-aid Low-risk band-aid fix for branch.
Attachment #149308 -
Flags: approval1.7?
Comment 136•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 149308 [details] [diff] [review] Possible branch band-aid a=chofmann for 1.7
Attachment #149308 -
Flags: approval1.7? → approval1.7+
Comment 138•20 years ago
|
||
(1.7 branch) VERIFIED: 06-01, Mac OS X 10.3.3 The problem was in 1.7RC2, but gone from my newer build. I'll try to verify windows soon.
Whiteboard: checkwinbranch, checklinuxbranch
Comment 139•20 years ago
|
||
WFM with Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040601
Assignee | ||
Comment 140•20 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #149915 -
Flags: review?(varga)
Comment 141•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 149915 [details] [diff] [review] Convert the trouble listbox to a friendly tree r=varga
Attachment #149915 -
Flags: review?(varga) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #149915 -
Flags: superreview?(jag)
Comment 142•20 years ago
|
||
I am not quite sure is this the same bug, but it is closely related. This is a user interface problem, whitch I managed to overcom by selecting first an other Profile, that could be opened. Then by selecting Switch Profile, I could select any of the profiles, BUT, it caused the browser to think, that it was in offline mode. So I had to check the offline away and then be back online with the favorite profile. This happened to me, when I had the profiles on a FAT32 filesystem, and using the same profiles for both when I booted Windows or Linux. My original problem, with the password manager, that could no more reveal the encrypted password, still exists. Mikko Silvennoinen
Comment 143•20 years ago
|
||
Even if this fixes the problem in the profile dialog, it seems like theres' still a but in the list code, no? If so, please make sure there's a bug on file on that if this code is closed after it no longer uses the list code.
Assignee | ||
Comment 144•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #143) >Even if this fixes the problem in the profile dialog, it seems like there's >still a bug in the list code, no? It might be a list bug, a CSS bug, or an XBL bug: XBL gets bound when either a) an element's frame gets created b) an elements JS wrapper gets created However in case b) if the element is not in a document at the time (i.e. it was created by JS) it has no style to tell it that it will have an XBL binding. Furthermore listbox child frames get created asynchronously for performance reasons, and then only for visible rows, so case a) does not apply either.
Comment 145•20 years ago
|
||
This probably just needs a slight tweak but if you go into tools and switch profile under classic theme, the profile names are too close to the icons in the dialog box that comes up. This is using Build ID 2004060809 on Win XP SP1 with patch in attachment 149915 [details] [diff] [review] applied.
Comment 146•20 years ago
|
||
WFM on Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; fr-FR; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040606 update of the bug status ?
Comment 147•20 years ago
|
||
Oliver: this was branch fixed, so yeah, the trunk status is still assigned. Mikko: I've had some recent complaints about profiles starting offline, but that really needs to be in it's own bug.
Comment 148•20 years ago
|
||
effectivelly NOT IN 1.8 build 2004061507 please keep in mind !
Comment 150•20 years ago
|
||
olivier.vit: Are you member of the drivers group? If not, please reset the flag you just set, or set it to end in a question mark to *request* blocker status! Only drivers may confirm blocker status! Don't use functionality you don't know!
Comment 151•20 years ago
|
||
my intention was question mark, sorry, sorry, sorry !
Flags: blocking1.8a2+ → blocking1.8a2?
Assignee | ||
Comment 152•20 years ago
|
||
Attachment #149915 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #152204 -
Flags: superreview?(jag)
Attachment #152204 -
Flags: review?(varga)
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #149915 -
Flags: superreview?(jag)
Comment 153•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 152204 [details] [diff] [review] Pad out the image sr=jag
Attachment #152204 -
Flags: superreview?(jag) → superreview+
Comment 154•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 152204 [details] [diff] [review] Pad out the image Looks good r=varga
Attachment #152204 -
Flags: review?(varga) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 155•20 years ago
|
||
Fix checked in.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago → 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.8a2?
Comment 156•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 152204 [details] [diff] [review] Pad out the image >- if( aEvent.detail == 2 && aEvent.button == 0 && aEvent.target.localName == "listitem") { >+ if (aEvent.button == 0 && event.target.parentNode.view.selection.count) { ^^^^^ Should be "aEvent" This will break click action.
Assignee | ||
Comment 157•20 years ago
|
||
Typo fix checked in. Thanks for spotting it!
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Comment 158•20 years ago
|
||
The browser ask about choosing a profile because one is in use, and I lost my bookmarked sites when tried to reach my profile wich was the default. I saw two and renamed the one I was using but the browser didn't let me use it. It said that that profile was in use that I had to choose another one.
Comment 159•19 years ago
|
||
V/fixed, 1.7.8 linux (finally). I'm upgrading a lot of my systems, I'll see if I can trunk verify.
Whiteboard: , checklinuxbranch
Comment 160•19 years ago
|
||
this is not fixed. using nightly builds I'm still experienceing this problem. I have 3 profiles and I cant select the theird one. doing so selects nothing. pressing run firefox correctly starts firefox with the "unselected" profile.
Assignee | ||
Comment 161•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #160) >pressing run firefox correctly starts firefox with the "unselected" profile. Except this bug is for Suite, not Firefox...
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•