Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Evidence for somatic mutation screening on aggressive prolactinomas

The recent Consensus Statement on the diagnosis and management of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas (prolactinomas) drew attention to molecular pathogenetic mechanisms. We comment that somatic screening for SF3B1 hotspot variants in select cases might alert to aggressive tumour behaviour and prompt the timely management and intense follow up of these challenging tumours.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Petersenn, S. et al. Diagnosis and management of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas: a Pituitary Society international Consensus Statement. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 19, 722–740 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Song, Z. J. et al. The genome-wide mutational landscape of pituitary adenomas. Cell Res. 26, 1255–1259 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Neou, M. et al. Pangenomic classification of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer Cell 37, 123–134.e5 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, F. et al. Integrated proteogenomic characterization across major histological types of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors. Cell Res. 32, 1047–1067 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, C. et al. Somatic SF3B1 hotspot mutation in prolactinomas. Nat. Commun. 11, 2506 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Simon, J. et al. Prevalence and clinical correlations of SF3B1 variants in lactotroph tumours. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 189, 372–378 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Duhamel, C. et al. Immunotherapy in corticotroph and lactotroph aggressive tumors and carcinomas: two case reports and a review of the literature. J. Pers. Med. 10, 88 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Tang, H. et al. Case report: temozolomide treatment of refractory prolactinoma resistant to dopamine agonists. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 12, 616339 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Raverot, G. et al. European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 178, G1–G24 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

M.T. acknowledges the support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (grant number 314061271-TRR 205).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marily Theodoropoulou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Theodoropoulou, M., Petersenn, S., Chanson, P. et al. Evidence for somatic mutation screening on aggressive prolactinomas. Nat Rev Endocrinol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-024-01010-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-024-01010-x

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing