Hamish Jones’ Post

View profile for Hamish Jones, graphic

We help business owners use tech better - both personally and in their business. Public Speaker, Consultant, Futurist, Strategist, Digital Transformation, AI, Web3, Community Building ☎️ 📱 💻 ☁️ 🥽

Last week I had a lot of fun playing the devil’s advocate when it comes to The Great DAO Debate as we ended Blockchain Week in Australia. The crowd was definitely a pro-DAO crowd but we still managed to pull off a win. It got me thinking that we need more debates and more challenging conventional wisdom in this space. Now conventional wisdom isn’t always bad but it can breed complacency. What are some of the conventional wisdom foundations of the web3 and blockchain space that we should be challenging? Here’s some to start. 1️⃣ We just need regulation 2️⃣ Everyone should manage their own keys 3️⃣ Decentralisation is always better 4️⃣ Public Blockchains are always better 5️⃣ NFTs are mainly for Digital Ownership 6️⃣ Web3 gaming is the mainstream moment. Anything else you can think of that is worthy of debating? I’m thinking of launching a semi-regular podcast - Wine & Web3 - where I challenge industry participants on their strongest held beliefs. Not because I necessarily disagree with what they believe but a strong argument means that they need to articulate their points better. What needs to be argued out? Who should I invite to participate? Michael Cotton Phil Talbot Yolanda Sam Jonathan Kay Joni Pirovich Callan Sarre Daniel Montoya Dr Nataliya Ilyushina Jamie N. Shourov Bhattacharya Marrs Coiro Sienna Tugendhaft Jane Rolls GT Sewell Karen Cohen Steve Vallas Greg Oakford John Bassilios Anthony Karakai Kanji Low

  • No alternative text description for this image
William Saunders

Founding Partner @ Multilateral | Independent Think Tank | Designing Post-Digital Reintermediation Strategies, Tools for Corporate, Government & Institutions

1y

The perspective is (still) way too narrow and siloed, even amongst the widest-of-eyed enthusiasts. Blockchain-centric thinking has formed its own set of constraints, locked within a paradigm of its own making, of which this list points to. Those who have ‘leaped’ into this paradigm don’t appear to have the desire to ‘leap’ again, and so the debate rolls on. A fresh perspective is right around the corner. Keep the faith.

Like
Reply

Instead of talk and trade make it argue and trade lol

Sienna Tugendhaft

Community Manager @ AlgoHUB | Blockchain Technology, Algorand Project Manager @ Women in Emerging Tech | Emerging Technology

1y

Great idea Hamish! Looking forward to listening in on these

Like
Reply
Shourov Bhattacharya

Co-Founder & CEO, Polynize

1y

Hi Hamish great idea. There are certain methodologies needed to break conditioned patterns and systematically make this exploration happen. Let's have a chat soon I'll share more.

Callan Sarre

Director at Cryptocate

1y

Yes! Love the concept Hamish and you would be the perfect host. A topic on onchain privacy could be interesting. Awesome to see this born off the back of the debate. Nice one.

Like
Reply
Huxley Peckham 🔥

I help businesses integrate Ai, Blockchain & Cybersecurity for scalable solutions | specialising in GPT & Open Interpreters | focused on partnerships & development relations | research-driven innovation

1y

Great stuff Hamish, I would suggest adding some topics on semi fungible tokens and the next generation of tokenisation technology, which broadens the applications of financial NFTs, happy to provide some insights.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics