W3Techs
provided by
Q-Success
Home Technologies Reports API Sites Quality Users Blog Forum FAQ Search

Featured products and servicesadvertise here

Blog Categories

All

News
AddThis
AddToAny
Adobe DTM
AdRoll
Advertising Networks
Akamai
Alibaba
Amazon
Amazon CloudFront
Angular
Apache
ASP.NET
ASP.NET Ajax
Baidu Analytics
Baidu Share
Bitrix
Blogger
Bootstrap
CDNJS
CentOS
Character Encodings
China Telecom
China Unicom
Chitika
Client-side Languages
Cloudflare
Cloudflare Server
ColdFusion
Compression
Concrete CMS
Content Delivery
Content Languages
Content Management
Cookies
CSS Frameworks
Data Centers
DataLife Engine
Debian
Default Protocol Https
DigiCert
DigiCert Group
Discuz!
DNS Servers
Dojo
DoubleClick
Drupal
Elementor
Email Servers
Ensighten
ExoClick
Facebook
Facebook Pixel
Fastly
Fedora
Flash
Full Circle Studies
Gemius
Gentoo
GlobalSign
Gmail
GoDaddy Group
Google
Google +1
Google Ads
Google AdSense
Google Analytics
Google Hosted Libraries
Google Servers
Google Tag Manager
GridPane
Gunicorn
Histats
Hostinger
Hotjar
HTML
HTML5
HTTP/2
HTTP/3
IdenTrust
Image File Formats
Infolinks
IPv6
Java
JavaScript
JavaScript Libraries
Joomla
JQuery
JQuery CDN
JsDelivr
Let’s Encrypt
Liferay
LinkedIn
Linux
LiteSpeed
Magento
Markup Languages
Matomo
Matomo Tag Manager
Microsoft
Microsoft-IIS
Modernizr
MooTools
New Relic
Newfold Digital Group
Nginx
Node.js
Operating Systems
OVH
PHP
Pinterest
Plesk
Plone
PNG
PopAds
PrestaShop
Prototype
Python
Quantcast
React
Red Hat
Reverse Proxies
Ruby
RunCloud
Scala
Scientific Linux
Sectigo
Server Locations
Server-side Languages
SharePoint
Shopify
Silverlight
Site Elements
Social Widgets
SPDY
Squarespace
SSL Certificate Authorities
Symantec Group
Tag Managers
Tealium
Team.blue
Tomcat
Top Level Domains
Traffic Analysis Tools
Twitter
TYPO3
Ubuntu
Umeng
Underscore
United Internet
Unix
Unpkg
UTF-8
VBulletin
Web Hosting
Web Panels
Web Servers
WhatsApp
Windows
Wix
WooCommerce
WordPress
WordPress Jetpack
Xandr
XHTML
Yandex.Direct
Yandex.Metrica
YUI Library

New reports show the usage of technologies by top sites

Posted by Sam Soltano on 21 October 2010 in News

Summary:

Most of our reports focus on how popular technologies are. But some technologies are interesting not because they are used by a huge number of sites, but because they are primarily used by high traffic sites. A new type of report shows which technologies these are.

Obviously, high traffic sites have different needs than average sites. Technologies that are well suited specifically for high traffic sites are rarely amongst the most popular ones. The new reports are based on a logarithmic scoring scheme, where technologies get a higher score when the average traffic rank of the sites that are using it, is low. You may think of the best scoring technologies as the most "up-market" ones, although, the difference is not always related to a price. It's simply that webmasters of high traffic sites prefer these technologies, whereas webmasters of average sites prefer other technologies, for whatever reason.

You can find the new reports in the breakdown menu of the technology overview reports (e.g. content management systems), labeled as "Top Site Usage".

You will find quite a few surprises when looking at the top scoring technologies. The current leaders in various categories are:

Please note that we don't calculate these scores for every category. For instance, we find it not useful for content languages, such as English or French. Webmasters are unlikely to choose the language based on such a scoring, and we don't want to get involved into a silly "my language is more up-market than yours" discussion.

We find it interesting to compare the new top site usage reports with ranking breakdown reports. If we take as an example the server-side programming language category, we see that PHP is used by 75% of the sites, while Java has a much higher top site usage score. Now, which language is actually used more by top sites in absolute figures? One can see this in the ranking brakdown report: Amongst the top 1.000 sites, PHP is used by 59% and Java is used by 27%. That is still a gap, but much narrower than amongst the top 1 million sites.

_________________
Please note, that all trends and figures mentioned in that article are valid at the time of writing. Our surveys are updated frequently, and these trends and figures are likely to change over time.

Share this page


About Us Disclaimer Terms of Use Privacy Policy Advertising Contact
W3Techs on   LinkedIn LinkedIn Twitter Twitter Mastodon Mastodon Bluesky Bluesky
Copyright © 2009-2024 Q-Success