Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 6
    Description #1 -- Desktop Replacements were not cheap -- if anything, they were more than an equivalent desktop due to the need for a monitor and getting everything assembled in a mobile environment. Commented Jul 22, 2009 at 17:36
  • By today's standards, you are right, they weren't cheap. But 5-6 years ago, they were the cheapest laptops you could get. They were a hundred or two dollars more than a desktop. The ones I'm thinking of had low end processors (Intel Celeron or AMD Duron), terrible battery life, 17" displays, probably weighed 10-12 lbs. I'm sure there were high end versions of these as well, but my memory is the low end is what was popular. DTR's probably put pressure on the traditional laptop to come down in price.
    – hanleyp
    Commented Jul 23, 2009 at 4:56
  • Your are missing a category, portable workstations. There are high end laptops with decent (not spectatural) graphics, processors, memory and drives. They are used as replacements for workstations in areas like CAD. They also make decent game machines. Look at the Dell Precision series as an example.
    – Jim C
    Commented Jan 5, 2010 at 13:47
  • Post-bounty note: The "marketing driven" is a timeless answer, which could include newer lines of products we see today--Chromebook, GPD MicroPC, Raspberry Pi laptop--that do not really fit into the three categories defined by the accepted answer. These niche products are indirectly covered by this timeless answer.
    – user109256
    Commented Dec 4, 2019 at 10:36