Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 4
    OK, I'll bite. What was OpenID intended for? Commented May 23, 2018 at 19:44
  • »Homepage ownership verification protocol«. - And yes, sure, might be a petty technicality. But it's the main usability blunder and why it failed with the average user bourgeois. ;)
    – mario
    Commented May 23, 2018 at 20:14
  • 4
    I can't find that phrase anywhere on the web. And OpenID.net's about page has, as its first sentence, "OpenID allows you to use an existing account to sign in to multiple websites, without needing to create new passwords." Commented May 23, 2018 at 20:44
  • 1
    Yep, it has been repurposed/advertised as SSO service later on. On the original mailing list lists.danga.com/pipermail/yadis/2005-June/subject.html it was mostly still "OpenID asserts ownership of URLs". Reusable logons was what people wanted it for, but not strictly designed towards.
    – mario
    Commented May 23, 2018 at 21:01