Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug] Globally "Dispute Resolution Committee" should be "Membership Committee" #146

Open
1 task done
xolotl opened this issue Sep 27, 2022 · 1 comment
Open
1 task done
Labels
💻 aspect: code Concerns the software code in the repository 🛠 goal: fix Bug fix 🟧 priority: high Stalls work on the project or its dependents 🚦 status: awaiting triage Has not been triaged & therefore, not ready for work
Projects

Comments

@xolotl
Copy link
Contributor

xolotl commented Sep 27, 2022

Description

I think what may have been called the CCGN Dispute Resolution Committee later transformed into the Membership Committee and not all references in documentation were changed.

Reproduction

See for example: https://github.com/creativecommons/global-network-strategy/blob/main/docs/chapters-standards.md

Expectation

Either only one name should be used consistently, or if there really are two different bodies, they both need to be documented.

Resolution

  • I would be interested in resolving this bug.
@xolotl xolotl added 🟧 priority: high Stalls work on the project or its dependents 🚦 status: awaiting triage Has not been triaged & therefore, not ready for work 🛠 goal: fix Bug fix 💻 aspect: code Concerns the software code in the repository labels Sep 27, 2022
@cc-open-source-bot cc-open-source-bot added this to Ready for Development in Active Sprint Sep 27, 2022
@cc-open-source-bot cc-open-source-bot removed this from Ready for Development in Active Sprint Sep 27, 2022
@cc-open-source-bot cc-open-source-bot added this to Pending Review in Backlog Sep 27, 2022
@TimidRobot TimidRobot moved this from Pending Review to CCGN in Backlog Oct 3, 2022
@TateGunning
Copy link

Let us not fixate on smallness. What is the ideal clean slate objective for our win win? If any! I am at loss of four years, bewildered. Like great ones in every state the concept is, “It is your life— no need to claim it!” There is only one outcome: adjust. Hopefully the adjustment is within ones control. Rule of thumb: simplicity, honesty, transparency, equality. Reflect it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
💻 aspect: code Concerns the software code in the repository 🛠 goal: fix Bug fix 🟧 priority: high Stalls work on the project or its dependents 🚦 status: awaiting triage Has not been triaged & therefore, not ready for work
4 participants
@xolotl @TateGunning and others