Discussion: standardize slugs for section styles

[annezazu]

In 6.6, the option to style sections of blocks, unofficially referred to as "section styles", is being introduced. To help with standardization and ultimately broader adoption and ease of use across themes, let's talk standardizing slugs for this new option:

Section.styling.mp4

I imagine this will impact Twenty Twenty-Five https://github.com/WordPress/twentytwentyfive and the development that occurs there, as well as the example that default theme sets.

In talking with others (@richtabor @bgardner @justintadlock @ndiego) today about this feature and problem, we discussed how ideally the slug value is as generic as possible (ex: section-1) and the titles can be set as they make the most sense per theme. Core directory patterns can then also use the generic slug and reflect your site's styles out of the box when viewing any core patterns. @WordPress/block-themers please share thoughts!

[bgardner]

Noting this is also being discussed at: WordPress/twentytwentyfive#3

[bgardner]

I love the movement toward an interoperable (instead of opinionated) approach and want to adopt whatever we decide here/TT5 in my work with Powder. I can't think of anything better (or more suitable) at the moment than the generic section-1, section-2, and section-3 approach for slugs. This naming convention gets my vote.