Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ability to save and add groups of blocks with default content #1680

Closed
Idealien opened this issue Jul 3, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Ability to save and add groups of blocks with default content #1680

Idealien opened this issue Jul 3, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@Idealien
Copy link

Idealien commented Jul 3, 2017

Definitely Enhancement.
This issue is opened to explore the idea of register / save groups of blocks with default/placeholder content. It may be a better fit as a part of the customizer enhancements?

Use Case 1 - New Theme for Existing Site
Default content feature with 4.7 / 2017 addressed part of this issue for new sites looking as good "out of box" as the preview pictures. But an existing site transitioning to a new theme site still struggles. Offering the theme developer ability to register groups of text + image blocks would change the ramp up from "Create a new page, add these 10 blocks, put these 4 settings and swap in your images" to "Create a new page, select the Home Page Layout 2, and edit the text".

Use Case 2 - Repetitive Content Scenarios
For authors that create multiple pages that have common groups (which are not stored as separate CPT / meta) it would offer the ability to save a set of blocks. Example: Golf leagues with weekly prize types, meeting agenda templates, regular blog series, etc.

Use Case 3 - Plugin Jumpstart
Same as Use Case 1 but tailored towards plugins that may use a series of blocks as "dashboard" or to offer sites the ability to make a layout "exactly like the demo site" without forcing page creation into the plugin activation cycle.

@youknowriad
Copy link
Contributor

related #1516

@karmatosed
Copy link
Member

I feel that this issue does fall under #1516. For now, lets make sure the discussion happens in one place. If I am wrong, we can reopen.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
3 participants