Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Haeckel Chiroptera.jpg

Interesting lithograph that appears in the bat article, and shows a variety of facial structures of certain bat species.

• Nominate and support. - RyGuy17 20:19, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - interesting. they're actually kind of cute. some look like litte bears or monkeys almost. --Deglr6328 21:11, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Another great lithograph. Interesting comparison. bcasterline t 23:11, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Great lithograph. --Lewk_of_Serthic _contrib ^talk 23:36, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Very illustrative! Mikeo 23:59, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. #8 looks like it was designed by Picasso. — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-04-09 01:08
• Support Lets make it 5 from the same guy! Other FPs from the same guy: Image:Haeckel_Prosobranchia.jpg, Image:Haeckel_Actiniae.jpg, Image:Haeckel_Batrachia.jpg ,Image:Haeckel_Spumellaria.jpg I'm going to go dig up pictures of every USAF plane to nominate. -Ravedave 03:58, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support This is funny, too - a great resource for me personally, next time I'll have to think up a new animated cartoon character design! ;-) --Janke | Talk 06:28, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support another great Haeckel. By the way, if anyone feels like checking that the scientific names are current (e.g. by googling each one) that would be appreciated. #1 (Brown long-eared bat) and #15 (Spectral Bat) are current and have their own articles. Also cutting out the individual bats would be good too, so they could be added to their individual articles (perhaps they need articles written first). Uh, anyway, yes, great image. —Pengo 14:22, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.--ragesoss 17:03, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:28, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Crisp, clear, creepy. Mooveeguy 19:31, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, great scan of a great litho. --Fastfission 20:40, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Haeckel Chiroptera.jpg