The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
This article was nominated for deletion on 9 January 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Contemporary Art, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Contemporary ArtWikipedia:WikiProject Contemporary ArtTemplate:WikiProject Contemporary ArtContemporary Art articles
Cleanup and Original Research tags
On 7 February 2008, Freshacconci (talk) posted Cleanup and Original Research tags on this article. On 14 February, I asked him on his talk page "to indicate what passages prompted this assessment." and to "Please supply details to the discussion page". Ten weeks (and some small edits) later, Freshacconci has not responded, so I am removing the tags. If anyone wants to address this issue, this discussion page is the forum. Grhabyt (talk) 09:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
