Talk:Last Ounce of Courage: Difference between revisions

Film: American Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This article is supported by the American cinema task force. This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Clearly the directory of this film didn't do his research. Then again, what do yo expect from the same studio that produced Atlas Shrugged: Part 1 and Obama 2016? The film seems to take advantage of events such as the case the ACLU had against the city of Florissant, Missouri back in 1998 for putting up a Christmas display on public property, which didn't settle too well with a local non-Christian resident.[1]

Secondly, does anyone seem to notice that this film takes a lot of cues from the activities of Anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan, whose son also died in combat like the movies protagonist, and then tries to politicize his legacy through some sort of spectacle that would dishonor their legacy? It's sort of the polar opposite of political viewpoints but the same results.

Add to this this film's low tactical maneuvers to lure audiences to see it including a spam emails and text messages[2] and "approval by Chuck Norris". As if anything not approved by him will threaten my masculinity. (I'd like to see him "approve" of reading Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austin, or is that not manly enough.)--Bushido Hacks (talk) 06:02, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]