Commons:Deletion requests/2024/06/18

This is not a photograph to apply {{PD-Italy}}. Anonymous works (the text in this case) is protected in Italy for 70 years since publication. Günther Frager (talk) 00:42, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right about the text, but the photo cropped from the page is ok; so I do the cropping. Let me know. OppidumNissenae (talk) 07:00, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That wouldn't be a problem. You can crop the image as long as the original image is deleted / hidden. Also, this image is being used in itwiki and can be uploaded (in full) locally as they allow images that are only in the Italian public domain. Günther Frager (talk) 07:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment My previous comments may be incorrect. The newspaper was published in 1980, so the photos would also have problems in Commons due to URAA, but they won't have issue in enwiki. Günther Frager (talk) 10:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page of a newspaper published in Italy in 1980. This is not a photograph to apply {{PD-Italy}}. Anonymous works (the text in this case) is protected in Italy for 70 years since publication. Thus it is protected in its country of origin. Günther Frager (talk) 00:44, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right about the text, but the photo cropped from the page is ok; so I do the cropping. Let me know. OppidumNissenae (talk) 07:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That wouldn't be a problem. You can crop the image as long as the original image is deleted / hidden. Günther Frager (talk) 07:20, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment My previous comments may be incorrect. The newspaper was published in 1980, so the photos would also have problems in Commons due to URAA, but they won't have issue in enwiki. Günther Frager (talk) 10:37, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Front page of a newspaper published in Italy in 1980. This is not a photograph to apply {{PD-Italy}}. Anonymous works (the text in this case) is protected in Italy for 70 years since publication. Thus it is protected in its country of origin. Günther Frager (talk) 00:48, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right about the text, but the photo cropped from the page is ok; so I do the cropping. Let me know. OppidumNissenae (talk) 07:02, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That wouldn't be a problem. You can crop the image as long as the original image is deleted / hidden. Günther Frager (talk) 07:20, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment My previous comments may be incorrect. The newspaper was published in 1980, so the photos would also have problems in Commons due to URAA, but they won't have issue in enwiki. Günther Frager (talk) 10:37, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Front page of a newspaper published in Italy in 1980. This is not a photograph to apply {{PD-Italy}}. Anonymous works (the text in this case) is protected in Italy for 70 years since publication. Thus it is protected in its country of origin. Günther Frager (talk) 00:49, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right about the text, but the photo cropped from the page is ok; so I do the cropping. Let me know. OppidumNissenae (talk) 07:03, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That wouldn't be a problem. You can crop the image as long as the original image is deleted / hidden. Günther Frager (talk) 07:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment My previous comments may be incorrect. The newspaper was published in 1980, so the photos would also have problems in Commons due to URAA, but they won't have issue in enwiki. Günther Frager (talk) 10:36, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pornographic image with no use on any Wikimedia project. Has been abused by a vandal on enwiki for image vandalism. Air on White (talk) 01:42, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Any image being used inappropriately for vandalism is a reason to block the vandal, not to delete the image. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:40, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The vandal is a known sockpuppeteer. Blocking individual accounts does not stop this vandal from using this image for vandalism. Air on White (talk) 08:12, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    still no reason to delete the image in question Adtonko (talk) 15:06, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Why not? "Not educationally useful" is a valid policy reason to delete an image, especially when it is abused by an LTA. Your response has no reasoning. Air on White (talk) 18:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      Where is the image, albeit explicit, not educationally? LTA or not, deleting this image will just refocus him to use another one. See the response of @Infrogmation of New Orleans. Adtonko (talk) 11:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

      "Blocking individual accounts does not stop this vandal" - no reason to think deleting this image will stop them either; as long as there are other images on Commons they can use in inappropriate contexts. (And if all anatomically explicit images were removed from Commons, that wouldn't stop vandals either; for some years we had a persistent vandal using an image from a 1920s automobile advertisement). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:13, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•   Keep Adequate quality image of human anatomy; Commons is not censored for nudity; argument that a vandal has misused an image is irrelevant. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:13, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment The category "Mother Ukraine" contains another 83 images of the statue (not all of them de minimis, and in use in articles about the statue). 70 more fotos of the statue have already been deleted. C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 03:51, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

logo of unnotable company, out of scope. 0x0a (talk) 04:26, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Professional photo found online https://www.musicinafrica.net/directory/asaph-clan and on YT as a profile pic. PCP. I think we need VRT to keep Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hayward being a producer, the distribution to him of an uncropped contact sheet is likely a limited distribution per Burnett v. Lambino, according to which "Restricted distribution to a circumscribed class of persons of an unpublished work, whether copyrighted under 17 U.S.C. § 12 or uncopyrighted, for the purpose of arousing interest in a possible sale or production, is a sufficiently limited distribution to work no forfeiture of an author's rights". The principle of precaution should apply here. This has been discussed here with Yann and C Lindberg prior to the renomination. — Racconish ^💬 08:34, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Keep I think the discussion made it clear that there is very little chance, i.e. much below the reasonable doubt, that the file was not published at the time, and that it is in the public domain due to lack of copyright notice. Yann (talk) 08:39, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment Not sure what part of the discussion you are referring to  . — Racconish ^💬 09:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carl's arguments. Yann (talk) 09:06, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hayward was listed as a producer of the 1958 run of The Concert (not sure what the 1960 date is exactly then). The back of the photo though says "gift of Leland Hayward" to the NYPL. While there were two sets of donations of Hayward's papers to the NYPL after his death, this photo is not listed as being part of either collection. It is part of a general "Jerome Robbins Dance Division Photograph Files" collection. If this was gifted to the NYPL by Hayward himself (who died in 1971), that would almost certainly have been general publication. The page at NYPL states that they conducted a copyright analysis, but could not come to a firm conclusion -- however they feel comfortable enough to publish it on the Internet, which is well beyond the explicit rights that 17 USC 108 gives libraries, and not sure would be fair use either (particularly if unpublished, which the nominator is arguing). There are a number of photos in the Hayward Collection that they do not publish, but state you need to come to the library to see it. Seems as though they digitized this in 2019, and it's still available. Best guess to me is that copyright lapsed at one point or another due to lack of notice on distributed copies, and the library felt that was likely enough to make it available online. There is almost always some gray area, and there certainly is here, so the question is if it is a "significant doubt" or something more theoretical, and I lean towards the latter. So   Weak keep for me. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment I would agree the internet distribution of an unpublished work goes beyond the explicit rights granted in the library exception, but we cannot base our analysis on a possible mistake nor assume that NYPL never makes mistakes. IMO "there is certainly a gray area here" is not satisfactory with respect to COM:PCP. In any case, NYPL says clearly their websites "contain materials that are in the public domain as well as materials that are protected by copyright. In cases where materials on the NYPL Websites are protected by third party rights, you are responsible for clearing the necessary rights in order to use the materials in question" [1]. — Racconish ^💬 09:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•   Keep per Yann and Clindberg, both have an in-depth understanding of USA/international copyright law. --RAN (talk) 14:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A copy of the book is available online. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1214110.pdf - I cannot find proof that this work by an unknown author is PD. Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•   Keep "This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code." The "Author" field was inadvertently left blank when I submitted the image and has now been edited with the correct information. Johnnie Bob (talk) 22:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• The author compiled photos for the book - that doesn't mean they were taken by the author or that they are PD. There is a chance this photo wasn't taken by a government employee Gbawden (talk) 06:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Aurelio Sandoval as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Mexican currency is copyrighted and the reproduction of designs is only permitted by seeking authorisation from the Ministry of Finance (Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público) - change to a regular DR: Coins not in focus, COM:DM may apply. Wdwd (talk) 09:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•   Keep Yes, modern Mexican currency is copyrighted, but this photo does not meaningfully reproduce copyrighted design. It is a photo of a human hand holding a bunch of coins, most of which are only seen from edge except for one coin seen at angle with significant blur which IMO is de minimis. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:36, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Copyvio (copyvio) - maybe old enough for PD-old, but missing detailed info about the original work. Wdwd (talk) 09:25, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a photo of me, i dont give permission to have this online. Please delete this. 147.161.132.193 09:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•   Comment unused, low res, only upload by user. Anon nominator: Sending a message confirming your identity to COM:VRT may expedite deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:43, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative works, no source or permission.

• File:6.Staffel.png
• File:BEVRIJDINGSLEGER LOGO.png
• File:DE ZWARTE HAND LOGO.png
• File:AS-GL LOGO 2.png
• File:AS-GL LOGO 1.png
• File:KEMPISCH LEGIOEN LOGO 1.png
• File:KEMPISCH LEGIOEN LOGO 2.png
• File:LA LEGION NOIRE LOGO.png
• File:NATIONAAL LEGIOEN - LEGION NATIONAL LOGO2.png
• File:NATIONAAL LEGIOEN - LEGION NATIONAL LOGO.png
• File:GROUPE-NOLA LOGO.png
• File:OF-FI LOGO FR.png
• File:OF-FI LOGO NL.png
• File:WapenschildHingene.svg
• File:MapHingene.svg
• File:MapBornem.svg

Yann (talk) 10:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All files are my own designs or re-designs. I spent a lot of time to draw that in Illustrator CS6. Bjoris (talk) 08:55, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

artwork ranging from 1979 onwards, needs permission from each artist.

• File:De oervis (acryl op paneel, 50x60cm, 2022). Foto door Samuel Pennynck.jpg
• File:Het Narrenschip (Ship of fools, acryl op doek, 250x200cm).jpg
• File:Atelier (Tipsy, 1986).tif
• File:Atelier met Tipsy (1986).jpg
• File:Saxy (olie op doek, 1990).jpg
• File:De dronkaard (olie op doek, 1981).jpg
• File:Op de rug van de grote vogel (acryl op paneel, 80x70cm, 1979).jpg
• File:Detail Tipsy (olie op doek, 180x130cm, 1986)..jpg
• File:Tipsy (olie op doek, 180x130cm, 1986).jpg
• File:Luc Martinsen in Galerie de Feniks. Foto door Samuel Pennynck (2023).jpg
• File:Atelier Luc Martinsen- verf en wasbak. Foto door Samuel Pennynck (2020)..jpg
• File:Luc Martinsen aan het werk. Foto door Samuel Pennynck.jpg
• File:Schilderij uithangsbord Galerie de Feniks (2023). Foto door Samuel Pennynck.jpg
• File:Het gesprek omtrent de muze.jpg
• File:Hommage aan Gust. De Smet (olie op doek, 80x70, 1981).jpg
• File:Rust (olie op doek, 200x200, 1980).jpg
• File:Luc Martinsen tentoonstelling Stedelijk Museum Oostende.jpg
• File:De verkouden criticus (120x100cm, olie op doek, 1980).jpg
• File:De verkouden criticus (1980, 120x100cm, olie op doek).jpg
• File:Terrible times. Saturnus by Goya (2020)..jpg
• File:De Verkouden Criticus. Olieverf op doek (1980).jpg
• File:Luc Martinsen en zelfportret.jpg
• File:Luna Twist.jpg
• File:Zelfportret (2023).jpg
• File:Luc Martinsen in Galerie de Feniks.jpg
• File:Luc Martinsen (oktober 2020).jpg

Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:42, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:43, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 10:43, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of these are own work, 2 have author info in exif, PCP

• File:Opus Kink - Village Underground.jpg
• File:Opus Kink press.jpg
• File:Opus Kink.jpg

Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims own work, but taken from a website. That website does not have any CC/PD disclaimer. — Alien333 (what I did & why I did it wrong) 11:42, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the owner of this photo and I'd like to remove this as the person appeared in the photo has requested me to delete it TanoDano (talk) 12:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•   Delete Support uploader request; people are already blurred, but not a useful illustration. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:49, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is blurry. We have file:Templo del Debod - panoramio - Ricardo Ricote Rodrí… (8).jpg from the same author and the same day. Taivo (talk) 12:25, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keine ordnungsgemäße Lizenzierung, Urheber kann nicht eine Institution sondern nur eine natürliche Person sein Lutheraner (talk) 12:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image is from the IT cell of AIMIM, a political party. Clearly not in public domain. C1MM (talk) 13:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious claim of own work and scope for the ones of the uploader

• File:رضا شهابیان و محمد مهدی شهابیان 0.jpg
• File:رضا شهابیان.jpg
• File:رضا شهابیان 00.jpg
• File:رضا شهابیان 0.jpg
• File:اصغر زیبایی نژاد و رضا شهابیان و نادر شهسواری سیاه بازی.jpg
• File:Iranian lgbt shir and khorshid.jpg
• File:Iranian Lesbian girl.jpg
• File:Gay iran.jpg
• File:Iranian boy gay.jpg
• File:Iranian gay boy.jpg
• File:Iranian gay boy kiss.jpg
• File:محمد مهدی شهابیان9.jpg
• File:رضا شهابیان21.jpg
• File:رضا شهابیان20.jpg
• File:رضا شهابیان1.jpg
• File:رضا شهابیان و محمد مهدی شهابیان 11.jpg
• File:رضا شهابیان و محمد مهدی شهابیان.jpg
• File:محمد مهدی شهابیان11.jpg
• File:اصغر زیبایی نژاد و محمد مهدی شهابیان.jpg
• File:محمد مهدی شهابیان10.jpg

Gbawden (talk) 13:43, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo of uploader's own art. It is an example of upcycled art, so not necessarily out of scope. Sinigh (talk) 14:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. File:Joyero reciclado.jpg
2. File:Cuadro de corazón.jpg
3. File:Marcos para fotos.jpg

= The uploader's other images. The nominated image and image #1 are more or less out of focus, but #2 and #3 are at least potentially useful as examples of upcycling in arts and crafts. Sinigh (talk) 14:24, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is fan art of Eren Jaeger from Attack on Titan, but it appears to violate the acceptance criteria of Commons:Fan art because the style of painting is very similar to the anime version and even reproduces creative elements such as the uniform, emblem, and sword design. IDCM (talk) 14:32, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of these are own work. Credited to 2 different photographers

• File:6 Lebohang-Kganye Ka-2-phisi-yaka-e-pinky-II 2013.jpg
• File:TPG DB24 039 H.Shuker.jpg
• File:LEBOHANG KGANYE @Andile Buka 0373 270224.jpg

Gbawden (talk) 14:40, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be original work, as the EXIF data indicates it is a 'screenshot.' — doclys (❀) 14:45, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file is a cropped image of low quality and the subject of the photo kindly requests it be removed. Happy to upload a newer, higher quality image of myself to be used in it's place. 174.95.70.236 14:47, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I uploaded this image.
• In my opinion requests for courtesy deletion shouldn't be considered if they come from anonymous IPs. WMF projects have a committee of volunteers who are trusted to keep the email addresses of third parties confidential. People making courtesy requests can email that committee, and a volunteer will reply, and confidentially confirm their real life identity. email permissions-commons@wikimedia.org
• This is a very important step, to make sure we don't perform courtesy deletions when the requestor is not actually the subject of the photo. An anonymous request may come from:

1. a fan
2. a rival
3. a frenemy
4. someone else playing a prank.

• Thank you for offering to upload alternate image(s), or at least one alternate image.
• Ms Reed, most people volunteering for WMF projects operate in good faith, and will use the best picture of you. If you or a friend uploads a superior image of you, that is the one we will use.
• Do you need help uploading your preferred image? I think emailing permissions-commons@wikimedia.org can help.
• Ms Reed, we have two other images, File:CFC in LA 2014 (13293211854).jpg and File:Tamara Jenkins plus Comedy Teams (11327342806).jpg, from which a headshot could be cropped. Should we assume you don't like either of them either?
• Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 18:36, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ms Reed, in February I saw the Bob Marley biopic. One of the other viewers had such interesting things to say about the film I eavesdropped on her. I asked her if she was a film student. It turns out she was a film director, Kelly Fyffe-Marshall. She agreed to let me take a couple of pictures of her. Here is one: File:Kelly Fyffe-Marshall, 2024 02 17, Market Cinema -c.jpg. If you live in Toronto, or you are visiting Toronto, I would be happy to meet you, briefly, in a public place, and take some photos of you, to upload here. If you bring along a colleague, or colleagues, who would like their photos uploaded here, I would be happy to upload pictures of them, too. Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 18:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyvio: The subject of the image is marked as the author, VRT request https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:02, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•   Ticket:2024062410008767 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 15:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyvio: The subject of the image is marked as the author, F10, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator

• File:Paisa MV Shoot 1.jpg
• File:Paisa MV Shoot 2.jpg
• File:Aryan Penta.jpg

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:10, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author request BHARATHESHA ALASANDEMAJALU (talk) 16:20, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• also file:Konkani singers from Goa and Mangalore, participants in the duo and duets song competition at the Ravindra Bhavan in Margao, October 2023. 22.jpg
• also file:Konkani singers from Goa and Mangalore, participants in the duo and duets song competition at the Ravindra Bhavan in Margao, October 2023. 27.jpg

The photos are very blurry. In addition, depicted people are unidentified and probably non-notable. Taivo (talk) 17:02, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seen elsewhere online eg [2] (full sized) [3] (smaller); user has uploaded some images with questionable claims Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:50, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is literally a picture I took for the promotional images of our podcast. You can see the edited version we used in the promotionals here in our social media https://www.instagram.com/p/Cu-SRZluxPO/?img_index=1 and the rest of the photos from the session here https://x.com/josetapiamx/status/1683315547562209280 Don jabs (talk) 18:07, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this image a very long time ago before I had a solid understanding of spacecraft imagery - Probably the object depicted in this crop is not Arrokoth. Ardenau4 (talk) 17:57, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Not yet: The image is still COM:INUSE. I agree, from what's been stated in the previous deletion request, and from looking at the image itself, that this is not an image of Arrokoth. See what they think about it on eo.wikipedia.org and ro.wikipedia.org. If they don't need the image then I see no reason to keep it. Renerpho (talk) 18:26, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If designed by an army official - we need a better source. The description claims it was never adopted, therefore (c) might be still with Disney. Masur (talk) 18:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Información falsa, no es la bandera oficial. 186.185.44.155 18:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SVG version uploaded Bruce The Deus (talk) 18:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Горнин Леонид Владимирович.jpg
• File:Phradkov-HR.png
• File:Tsivileva-HR.png
• File:Gornin-HR.png

Not "own work". The first photo is straight up taken from the Internet, with the later three being Internet photos with some kind of stock Russian military background. --Vanyka-slovanyka (talk) 18:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.instagram.com/p/C8RmjcPP2zN/ Xocolatl (talk) 19:02, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not "own work" Toweli (talk) 19:10, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused corporate logo. Previuosly deleted as F10, but I think it's probably better to bring it here since it isn't a personal file. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 20:12, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•   Delete, per Red-tailed hawk. It appears to be outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 13:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
•   Comment: File:Metaconex-logo-icon-official.jpg is an equivalent file and File:Metaconex-logo-homepage.png is related; both were uploaded by Metaconex Ltd (talk · contribs), apparently for promotional purposes. If the outcome of the nominated file is deletion, then these two other files should be deleted for the same reason. Marbletan (talk) 13:46, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External source, copyright status is not clear.

• File:Caucasian Imamate 1856.jpg
• File:Имамалла 1856.jpg
• File:Caucasian Imamate map.jpg
• File:Ичкеринское наибство.jpg
• File:Ауховское наибство.jpg
• File:Салатавское наибство.jpg
• File:Мичикское наибство.jpg

Quick1984 (talk) 20:51, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Quick1984, Can you link to an external source where there are maps? Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 09:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence this is US Navy official’s work, grabbed from the website, which states: All contents of this site are copyright © 1994-2003, Andrew C. Toppan. All Rights Reserved. 188.123.231.76 21:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Caption from here says A Project 30B Skoryy class destroyer in the Mediterranean on 28 August 1968. Here is a nearly identical photo from a slightly different angle, on the same date. Most likely from the same USN aircraft, NHHC photo K-56707. USN NHC says it is dated same date Aug 28, 1968, National Archives. I'm not able to quickly locate the exact angle of the photo, but it's pretty clear this was a PD-USN photo from Aug 28, 1968 that is being used on hazegray.org --Dual Freq (talk) 22:41, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated SusanRichards85 (talk) 21:25, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Geohakkeri as Noncommercial (cc-by-nc-3.0)  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See User_talk:Gamaliel#File:Madroño_a_West_American_journal_of_botany_v6.djvu for clarification. --Geohakkeri (talk) 21:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by DavidArnoult as Noncommercial (cc-by-nc-nd-4.0)  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

out of project scope

• File:Louis Mulian.jpg
• File:Louis Muliane mit Jp.jpg
• File:Louis Muliane.jpg

Codc (talk) 22:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no FoP for interior views in Germany and Germany has a standard of life + 70 years. The buildings architect is Richard Meier and he is still alive.

• File:Stadthaus Ulm innen.jpg
• File:Stadthaus Ulm innen1.jpg
• File:Stadthaus Ulm innen3.jpg

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:57, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]