Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 10;8(5):e01492-17.
doi: 10.1128/mBio.01492-17.

Dysbiosis and Its Discontents

Katarzyna B Hooks  1   2 , Maureen A O'Malley  1
Affiliations

Dysbiosis and Its Discontents

Katarzyna B Hooks et al. mBio. .

Abstract

Dysbiosis is a key term in human microbiome research, especially when microbiome patterns are associated with disease states. Although some questions have been raised about how this term is applied, its use continues undiminished in the literature. We investigate the ways in which microbiome researchers discuss dysbiosis and then assess the impact of different concepts of dysbiosis on microbiome research. After an overview of the term's historical roots, we conduct quantitative and qualitative analyses of a large selection of contemporary dysbiosis statements. We categorize both short definitions and longer conceptual statements about dysbiosis. Further analysis allows us to identify the problematic implications of how dysbiosis is used, particularly with regard to causal hypotheses and normal-abnormal distinctions. We suggest that researchers should reflect carefully on the ways in which they discuss dysbiosis, in order for the field to continue to develop greater predictive scope and explanatory depth.

Keywords: dysbiosis; homeostasis; microbial diversity; microbiome; microbiota.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
The contributions of Metchnikoff, Furney, and Scheunert to dysbiosis thinking. Metchnikoff photo from Les Prix Nobels 1908; Furney book cover from https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=nnc1.1000947504;view=1up;seq=5; and Scheunert photo from http://www.ullmann-bernau.de/Ahnengemeinschaften (used with permission of the creator of the digital rendition, Steffen Ullmann [original photographer unknown]).
FIG 2
FIG 2
Helmut Haenel’s representations of dysbiosis and eubiosis. Image of Haenel used with permission of the Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Figures of eubiosis and dysbiosis reconstructed from the work of Haenel (Fig. 4 and 5 in reference 16).
FIG 3
FIG 3
Definitions of dysbiosis. (A) Types of definitions with sample quotes, sometimes slightly paraphrased. References: , Maynard et al. (2012); , Arrieta et al. (2016); , Nibali et al. (2014); , Williams and Gallo (2015); , Lewis et al. (2015); , Youmans et al. (2015); , Lawley et al. (2012); , Jones et al. (2014); , Bested et al. (2013); , Sommer and Bäckhed (2013). (B) Popularity of different definitions.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Olesen SW, Alm EJ. 2016. Dysbiosis is not an answer. Nat Microbiol 1:16228. doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.228. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levy M, Kolodziejczyk AA, Thaiss CA, Elinav E. 2017. Dysbiosis and the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 17:219–232. doi:10.1038/nri.2017.7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stecher B, Maier L, Hardt WD. 2013. ‘Blooming’ in the gut: how dysbiosis might contribute to pathogen evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:277–284. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2989. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wing MR, Patel SS, Ramezani A, Raj DS. 2016. Gut microbiome in chronic kidney disease. Exp Physiol 101:471–477. doi:10.1113/EP085283. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Metchnikoff É. 1908. Études sur la flore intestinale. Putréfaction intestinale. Ann Inst Pasteur 22:930–955.

Publication types